Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents
The Case of States and Quasi-States
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12160528 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Toni Erskine (0000-0002-5352-6319, University of Cambridge, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 67-85 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics & International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0892-6794 • E-ISSN: 1747-7093 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00359.x |
| OpenAlex | W2038270806 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 70 |
| Referencias citadas | 19 |
Determining who, or indeed what, is to respond to prescriptions for action in cases of international crisis is a critical endeavor. Without such an allocation of responsibilities, calls to action–whether to protect the environment or to rescue distant strangers–lack specified agents, and, therefore, any meaningful indication of how they might be met. A fundamental step in arriving at this distribution of duties is identifying moral agents in international relations, or, in other words, identifying those bodies that can deliberate and act and thereby respond to ethical guidelines. Often, the most effective and relevant moral agents in international relations are not individuals but institutions. However, it is necessary to qualify any claim that institutions can bear duties in international relations. Not only must they possess capacities for decision-making and purposive action, they must also enjoy the conditions under which specific duties can be discharged. The importance of this latter stipulation can be usefully illustrated by examining the disparate circumstances within which states–those that exercise positive sovereignty and those that are sovereign only in name–are expected to act
Action (physics · Business · International relations · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Stipulation · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Conclusion
Democratic Anthropocene
Governance in the Holocene
Sustainability
Governance in the Anthropocene
Who will form the Anthropocene?
Anthropocene
Planetary justice
How to Overcome Structural Injustice? Social Connectedness and the Tenet of Subsidiarity
The Collective Responsibility of Democratic Publics
Locating Responsibility
Joint Duties and Global Moral Obligations
Holding Nations Responsible
We the People
No Apologies? The Role of Apology for Structural‐Historical Injustice
On the Relation Between Collective Responsibility and Collective Duties
Are Corporations Like Psychopaths? Lessons On Moral Responsibility From Rio Tinto's Juukan Gorge Disaster
Husserl on the state
A metaphysical account of agency for technology governance
Institutional Corruption
Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence
Sharing the costs of political injustices
Democracy, national responsibility and climate change justice
Refusing to be a Man
Kicking Bodies and Damning Souls
Coalitions of the Willing and Responsibilities to Protect
Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals
Can Political Institutions Commit Civil Disobedience
The Climate Duties of Sub-National Political Communities
Peoples and Persons
Climate change, security and the institutional prospects for ecological security
Committing to human rights in Australia’s corporate sector
Beyond Values and Interests
Unilateral jurisdiction
How Should We Respond to ‘Delinquent’ Institutions
Delinquent’ States, Guilty Consciences and Humanitarian Politics in the 1990s
Plural Views, Common Purpose
Blaming the United Nations
The ethics of Carr and Wendt
Collective responsibility and the state
Ethics and international law
Reconstructing responsibility and moral agency in world politics
Weighing responsibilities
Are international organizations agents in their own right? A plural subject perspective
Moral agents and legal persons
Leviathan on trial
Reluctant to Protect? The Role of Moral Reputation in Joining Military Coalitions
Cooperative duties of efficiency and efficacy
Realist agency and phenomenological subjectivity
Everyday ethics of the global event
The state as citizen
Global justice, states, and the relational view
The European Union’s responsibility to protect refugees
Short of disarmament
Before algorithmic Armageddon
Existential threats, shared responsibility, and Australia’s role in ‘coalitions of the obligated’
Accepting responsibility? Institutions and the security implications of climate change
A Critical Political Cosmopolitanism for Conflict De-escalation
A Political Theory of Treaty Repudiation
Distributing States' Duties
Saving friends or saving strangers? Critical humanitarianism and the geopolitics of international law
The duty to oppose violence
South Africa's Vaccine Roll-Out and Its Potential Costs to Our Social Contract
Good citizen Europe
The two faces of personhood
Why go local? Developing the research agenda for “local political theory
Backward-looking reparations and structural injustice
One another’s equals? Humanity and the state in international theory
Artificial persons and attributed actions
Beyond 'Those Who Leave and Those Who Stay
The Identities of persons
Collective and Corporate Responsibility
Political innovation and conceptual change
The Global Covenant
Quasi-States
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Social Theory of International Politics
Cognitio humana - Dynamik des Wissens und der Werte
Moral Agency and International Society
A Reply to A.G. Hopkins
Aid and sovereignty
Responding to State Failure in Africa
Responding to State Failure in Africa
Moral man and immoral society
Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa
Economic Reform in a Democratizing Africa
Governance and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa
| Obras citantes distintas | 70 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,18 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2004 - 2026 (23) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 70 |