How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes

A fuzzy‐trace theory approach

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12165949
AutoresValerie F Reyna (0000-0003-2851-5797, Human Neuroscience Institute Cornell University Ithaca NY USA, autor de correspondencia), Priscila G Brust-Renck (0000-0001-9891-510X, Human Neuroscience Institute Cornell University Ithaca NY USA)
Año2020
Volumen33
Número5
Páginas606-628
Fecha de publicación2020-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.2179
OpenAlexW3014622127
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas12
Referencias citadas83

Higher numeracy has been associated with decision biases in some numerical judgment‐and‐decision problems. According to fuzzy‐trace theory, understanding such paradoxes involves broadening the concept of numeracy to include processing the gist of numbers—their categorical and ordinal relations—in addition to objective (verbatim) knowledge about numbers. We assess multiple representations of gist, as well as numeracy, and use them to better understand and predict systematic paradoxes in judgment and decision‐making. In two samples ( N s = 978 and 957), we assessed categorical (some vs. none) and ordinal gist representations of numbers (higher vs. lower, as in relative magnitude judgment, estimation, approximation, and simple ratio comparison), objective numeracy, and a nonverbal, nonnumeric measure of fluid intelligence in predicting: (a) decision preferences exhibiting the Allais paradox and (b) attractiveness ratings of bets with and without a small loss in which the loss bet is rated higher than the objectively superior no‐loss bet. Categorical and ordinal gist tasks predicted unique variance in paradoxical decisions and judgments, beyond objective numeracy and intelligence. Whereas objective numeracy predicted choosing or rating according to literal numerical superiority, appreciating the categorical and ordinal gist of numbers was pivotal in predicting paradoxes. These results bring important paradoxes under the same explanatory umbrella, which assumes three types of representations of numbers—categorical gist, ordinal gist, and objective (verbatim)—that vary in their strength across individuals

Categorical variable · Cognitive psychology · GiST · Numeracy · Ordinal data · Statistics · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology