Hedonic versus informational evaluations
Task dependent preferences for sequences of outcomes
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12166115 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gal Zauberman (0000-0001-5416-9555, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, autor de correspondencia), Kristin Diehl (0000-0002-5408-652X, University of Southern California), Dan Ariely (0000-0002-6175-4151, Duke University) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 191-211 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bdm.516 |
| OpenAlex | W2114790003 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
This work examines how people form evaluations of extended experiences that vary in valence and intensity. It is documented that when people retrospectively evaluate such experiences, not all information is weighted equally. Some prior research demonstrates that earlier parts are weighted more than later parts, while other research shows the opposite. In this paper we suggest that differences in evaluation tasks shift the focus to different aspects of the experience, causing individuals to be differentially influenced by earlier or later parts of the experience. We show that ratings of feelings (hedonic evaluation tasks) lead to stronger preferences for improving experiences than do evaluative judgments (informational evaluation tasks), suggesting that later aspects of the experience are weighted more heavily in affective tasks. In addition, we investigate other evaluation tasks, demonstrating that whether the task is descriptive or predictive and whether the target of the evaluation is the source of the experience or the experience itself also alter the weight given to different parts of the experience. Our studies demonstrate systematic shifts driven by these different evaluation task, revealing changes in overall evaluations as well as changes in the underlying weighting of key characteristics of the experience (i.e., start, end, and trend). Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Cognitive psychology · Feeling · Task (project management · Valence (chemistry · Weighting · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Are Voters Myopic or Looking for Improvement?
Duration sensitivity of key moments
Meaning Beyond Numbers
Hedonic Evaluation over Short and Long Retention Intervals
My Recency, Our Primacy
How Quickly We Selectively Forget
Substituting the End for the Whole
Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making
The Social Context of Temporal Sequences
The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.
Order effects in belief updating
Preferences for sequences of outcomes.
Comparison processes in social judgment
Patients' memories of painful medical treatments
When More Pain Is Preferred to Less
Partial Omega Squared for Anova Designs
Primacy and assimilation in the attribution process
Combining experiences over time
Gestalt characteristics of experiences
Evaluations of pairs of experiences
On the making of an experience
Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption
Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment
Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation
Pragmatic use of categorical information in impression formation
Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference
Affective and semantic components in political person perception
Velocity relation
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes
Pattern of performance and ability attribution
Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements
Forming impressions of personality
The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects
Searching Ordered Sets
The Time Course and Impact of Consumers' Erroneous Beliefs about Hedonic Contrast Effects
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,64 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |