Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12166289
AutoresNada R Sanders (0000-0003-4440-1001, Wright State University, autor de correspondencia), Larry P Ritzman (Boston College, autor de correspondencia)
Año1992
Volumen5
Número1
Páginas39-52
Fecha de publicación1992-01-01
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.3960050106
OpenAlexW1998141298
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas26

The purpose of this research is to assess the extent to which judgmental forecasts are improved by having more contextual and technical knowledge. Contextual information is knowledge gained by practitioners through experience on the job, consisting of general forecasting experience in the industry as well as specific product knowledge. Technical knowledge is knowledge about data analysis and formal forecasting procedures, including information on how to analyze data judgmentally. We directly compared judgmental forecasts of business practitioners with those generated by students, using 22 real‐world time series. The practitioners had considerable contextual but no technical knowledge. The students had no contextual but two different levels of technical knowledge. We also generated forecasts with statistical methods to benchmark performance. Results show that contextual knowledge is particularly important in making good judgmental forecasts, while technical knowledge has little value. Practitioner forecasts are better than student forecasts in almost all comparisons. A decisive factor affecting forecast performance appears to be data variability, measured by the coefficient of variation of the time‐series data. As the variability of a time series increases, the performance of all forecasts deteriorates, but judgmental forecasts by practitioners become more preferable. Statistical methods have difficulty achieving reasonable forecasts when the data are more variable, whereas judgemental forecasts reinforced by contextual information do relatively well. Data variability is one explanation for the mixed findings of past studies, relative to how well statistical techniques compare with judgment as a forecasting method

Benchmark (surveying · Consensus forecast · Contextual design · Econometrics · Economics · Product (mathematics · Variable (mathematics · Variation (astronomy · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Mathematics · Artificial Intelligence

  • Principles of Forecasting

    J Scott Armstrong•Principles of Forecasting•2001

  • Judgmental forecasts of time series affected by special events

    Open Access•Paul Goodwin, Robert Fildes•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1999

  • Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts

    Open Access•Joa Sang Lim, Marcus O’Connor•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1995

  • Combining forecasts

    Open Access•Robert T Clemen•International Journal of…•1989

  • Judgmental forecasting

    Open Access•Olaf Helmer•Futures•1988

Citas por año0,1
Intervalo de citas1995 - 2001 (7)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae