Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Effects of Expertise on the Hindsight Bias

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12166456
AutoresMelissa A Z Knoll (The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA, autor de correspondencia), Hal R Arkes (0000-0003-1448-095X, The Ohio State University Columbus OH USA)
Año2016
Volumen30
Número2
Páginas389-399
Fecha de publicación2016-03-29
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bdm.1950
OpenAlexW2302978177
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas43

We present data from three experiments examining the effects of objective and subjective expertise on the hindsight bias. In Experiment 1, participants read an essay about baseball or dogs and then answered questions about the baseball essay to the best of their ability, as if they had not read the essay, or to the best of their ability, although they read about dogs. Participants also completed a quiz about baseball rules and terminology, which was an objective measure of expertise. Results demonstrated that as participants' baseball expertise increased, their inability to act as if they never read the essay also increased; expertise exacerbated the hindsight bias. To test the effects of subjective expertise on hindsight bias and investigate factors underlying the relationship, participants in Experiment 2 ranked five topics in order of expertise and gave feeling‐of‐knowing (FOK) ratings for questions from these topics. Foresight participants then saw each question again and answered the questions; hindsight participants saw the questions and answers and gave the probability they would have known the answers had they not been provided. Hindsight bias increased with subjective expertise as did average FOK ratings. In Experiment 3, we experimentally manipulated perceived expertise but found that neither average FOK ratings nor hindsight bias was affected by experimentally induced expertise. Taken together, the results demonstrate that expertise exacerbates both objective and subjective hindsight bias but that an FOK, which likely exists only when expertise is naturally acquired, is necessary to engender the detrimental effect of expertise on the hindsight bias. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Cognitive psychology · Feeling · Hindsight bias · Linguistics · Response bias · Terminology · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A Grade for Artificial Intelligence

    Maria Concetta Carruba, Anna Caiazzo et al.

  • The role of perceptual difficulty in visual hindsight bias for emotional faces

    Open Access•Emily Burgess, Mei-Ching Lien•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

  • Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them

    Open Access•Andrea Bonaccorsi, Riccardo Apreda et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Domain Knowledge and Hindsight Bias among Poker Players

    Open Access•Dustin P Calvillo, Abraham M Rutchick•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2013

  • Adding to the Controversy? Civil Society’s Evaluation of the National Conference Dialogue in Yemen

    Open Access•Moosa Elayah, Luuk Van Kempen et al.•Journal of Intervention and…•2020

  • Premature infatuation and commitment in individual investing decisions

    Open Access•Steven S Posavac, Mark Ratchford et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2019

  • Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge

    Open Access•George J Spilich, Gregg T Vesonder et al.•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1979

  • Competence in experts

    Open Access•James Shanteau•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1992

  • How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

    Asher Koriat•Psychological Review•1993

  • Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems

    Open Access•Jill Larkin, John Mcdermott et al.•Science•1980

  • Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Hindsight is not equal to foresight

    Baruch Fischhoff•Journal of Experimental…•1975

  • On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies

    Barbara J Mcneil, Stephen G Pauker et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•1982

  • Perception in chess

    Open Access•William G Chase, Herbert A Simon•Cognitive Psychology•1973

  • Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge

    Open Access•Harry L Chiesi, George J Spilich et al.•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1979

  • The effects of mental contamination on the hindsight bias

    Open Access•Melissa A Z Marks, Hal R Arkes•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008

  • Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect

    Mark D Alicke, M L Klotz et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • Expert performance

    K Anders Ericsson, Neil Charne et al.•American Psychologist•1994

  • How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance

    Joyce Ehrlinger, David Dunning•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know

    Raymond S Nickerson•Psychological Bulletin•1999

Citas por año0,46
Intervalo de citas2013 - 2023 (11)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae