Usage-based linguistics and the magic number four
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12197609 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Clarence Green (0000-0003-3463-141X, 1Department of English Language and Literature, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 28 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 209-237 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-03-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Cognitive Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0936-5907 • E-ISSN: 1613-3641 |
| Editorial | De Gruyter Mouton (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/cog-2015-0112 |
| OpenAlex | W2595385558 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 46 |
Miller’s (1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97) working memory (WM) capacity of around seven items, plus or minus two, was never found by usage-based linguists to be a recurrent pattern in language. Thus, it has not figured prominently in cognitive models of grammar. Upon reflection, this is somewhat unusual, since WM has been considered a fundamental cognitive domain for information processing in psychology, so one might have reasonably expected properties such as capacity constraints to be reflected in language use and structures derived from use. This paper proposes that Miller’s (1956) number has not been particularly productive in usage-based linguistics because it turns out to have been an overestimate. A revised WM capacity has now superseded it within cognitive science, a “magic number four plus or minus one” (Cowan 2001, The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1). 87–185). This paper suggests, drawing on evidence from spoken language corpora and multiple languages, that a range of linguistic structures and patterns align with this revised capacity estimate, unlike Miller’s (1956), ranging from phrasal verbs, idioms, n-grams, the lengths of intonation units and some abstract grammatical properties of phrasal categories and clause structure
Cognition · Cognitive linguistics · Grammar · Linguistics · MAGIC (telescope · Miller · Working memory · Computer Science · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Frequency in Language
The Grammar Network
Processing units of spoken language and the Mapping Problem
Looking for multi-word expressions in American Sign Language
Semantic micro-dynamics as a reflex of occurrence frequency
Exploring knowledge of transparent and non-transparent multi-word phrases among L2 English learners living in an Anglophone setting
Scaling Laws for Phonotactic Complexity in Spoken English Language Data
The effects of context, story-type, and language proficiency on EFL word learning and retention from reading
Language, Usage and Cognition
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Grammatical processing in language learners
The magical number 4 in short-term memory
A theory of lexical access in speech production
The neural theory of metaphor
On the capacity of attention
Early language acquisition
Properties of Spoken and Written Language
Working memory and language
Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning
Word length and the structure of short-term memory
Working Memory, Thought, and Action
A Comprehensive grammar of the English language
Strategies of discourse comprehension
A Phrasal Expressions List
The Acquisition of Polysynthetic Languages
The magical number seven, plus or minus two
Cognitive (Construction) Grammar
If you look at
Formulaic language
The Most Frequently Used Spoken American English Idioms
From Usage to Grammar
Cortical memory mechanisms and language origins
More than words
Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries
Theories of artificial grammar learning
Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension
Prolegomena to discourse-pragmatics
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |