Doing Harm
A Reply to Klocksiem
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12228551 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Erik Carlson (0000-0002-1558-3865, Uppsala University), Jesper Johansson (0000-0002-2484-4502, Uppsala University, autor de correspondencia), Olle Risberg (0000-0001-5820-1145, Uppsala University) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 35 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 229-237 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-05-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Utilitas (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0953-8208 • E-ISSN: 1741-6183 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0953820823000079 |
| OpenAlex | W4378653020 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 11 |
In a recent article in this journal, Justin Klocksiem proposes a novel response to the widely discussed failure to benefit problem for the counterfactual comparative account of harm (CCA). According to Klocksiem, proponents of CCA can deal with this problem by distinguishing between facts about there being harm and facts about an agent's having done harm. In this reply, we raise three sets of problems for Klocksiem's approach
Counterfactual thinking · Criminology · Do no harm · Economics · Epistemology · Harm · Law and economics · Positive economics · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |