Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Manufacturing a Consensus

Nazi Propaganda and the Building of a ‘National Community’ ( Volksgemeinschaft )

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12270010
AutoresDavid Welch (0000-0002-7066-2830, autor de correspondencia)
Año1993
Volumen2
Número1
Páginas1-15
Fecha de publicación1993-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaContemporary European History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0960-7773 • E-ISSN: 1469-2171
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s096077730000028x
OpenAlexW2134658890
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas8

The point has to be made at once that any attempt to quantify public reaction to Nazi propaganda is fraught with difficulties. Accurate measurement of the effectiveness of Nazi propaganda is weakened by the absence of public opinion surveys and the fact that, in a society that resorted so readily to coercions and terror, reported opinion did not necessarily reflect the true feelings and moods of the public, especially if these views were opposed to the regime. Nevertheless, to state that public opinion in the Third Reich ceased to exist is not strictly true. After the Nazi ‘seizure of power’ in 1933, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels stressed the importance of co-ordinating propaganda with other activities. In a dictatorship, propaganda must address itself to large masses of people and attempt to move them to a uniformity of opinion and action. But the Nazis also understood that propaganda is of little value in isolation. To some extent this explains why Goebbels impressed on all his staff at the Ministry of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda the imperative necessity constantly to gauge public moods. Goebbels therefore regularly received (as did all the ruling élites) extraordinarily detailed reports from the Secret Police (SD reports) about the mood of the people and would frequently quote these in his diary. Hitler, too, was familiar with these reports, and his recorded determination to avoid increasing food prices at all costs for fear that this would undermine the regime's popularity suggests a political sensitivity to public opinion. To assure themselves of continued popular support was an unwavering concern of the Nazi leadership, and of Hitler and Goebbels in particular

Democracy · Dictatorship · Nazi Germany · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Public opinion · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · German History and Society · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law

  • The Holy Reich

    Open Access•Richard Steigmann‐Gall, Richard Steigmann-Gall•Holy Reich•2003

  • From Plauderei to Propaganda

    Open Access•Kate Lacey•Media Culture & Society•1994

  • The Social Policy of Nazi Germany

    Frank H Hankins, C W Guillebaud•Southern Economic Journal•1941

  • The Nazi Economic Recovery 1932–1938

    Open Access•R J Overy, Richard Overy•The Nazi Economic Recovery…•1982

  • Hitler's Social Revolution

    Louis L Snyder, David Schoenbaum•The American Historical Review•1968

  • German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler, by Henry Ashby Turner, Jr.

    Open Access•Robert E Neil•Political Science Quarterly•1986

  • Life in the Third Reich

    David B King, Richard Bessel•German Studies Review•1988

  • Behemoth

    Open Access•Koppel S Pinson•Political Science Quarterly•1942

  • German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler

    Fritz Stern, Henry Ashby Turner•Foreign Affairs•1985

  • Labour in the Third Reich, 1933-1939

    Timothy W Mason•Past & Present•1966

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,06
Intervalo de citas1994 - 2003 (10)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae