Pension splitting in England and Wales
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12284366 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Antony W Dnes (0000-0001-6994-4761, a Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences , The Nottingham Trent University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1999 |
| Volumen | 21 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 41-61 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Social Welfare Law (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0141-8033 • E-ISSN: 1469-9621 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09649069908410552 |
| OpenAlex | W2044579594 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
In this paper, I examine the recent UK developments concerning pension division in divorce cases, particularly in relation to earmarking and splitting. of particular interest are the welfare (standard of living) effects of pension division and valuation issues, which have been found to be especially tricky in the debate over pension splitting, and which I examine in terms of expectation, reliance, restitution, rehabilitation, partnership and needs-based standards of appraisal. The recent extension of the law affecting pension rights at divorce can be seen as improving upon the courts' traditional reluctance to deal with uncertain assets, given that there are ways of valuing these. The difference between earmarking and splitting is not great, as it is possible to translate one type of award into the other
Actuarial science · Economics · General partnership · Law and economics · Market economy · Pension · Political science · Public economics · Restitution · Valuation (finance · Welfare · Law · Legal principles and applications · Accounting · Finance
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,04 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2001 - 2001 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |