Guided self-help supported by paraprofessional mental health workers
An uncontrolled before-after cohort study
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12287293 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Paul Farrand (0000-0001-7898-5362, University of Plymouth, autor de correspondencia), Phil Confue (University of Plymouth), Richard Byng (0000-0001-7411-9467, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry), Steve Shaw (University of Plymouth) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 17 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 9-17 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-10-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Health & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00792.x |
| PMID | 18564197 |
| OpenAlex | W1971353627 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
There has been considerable development of guided self-help clinics within primary care. This uncontrolled before-after cohort study examines efficiency and effectiveness of these clinics when supported by paraprofessional mental health workers having little mental health training and experience. Data were collected by seven Graduate Mental Health Workers (GMHW) located in South-west England. Alongside an analysis of clinic attendance and dropout, efficiency was measured with respect to the number and length of sessions to support patients with the effectiveness of the interventions examined with respect to problem severity. Over a 15-month period, 1162 patients were referred to the GMHW clinics with 658 adopting guided self-help. Patients using guided self-help received an average input per patient, excluding assessment, of four sessions of 40 minutes. Dropout rate was comparable to other primary-care-based mental health clinics supported by experienced mental health professionals with 458 patients completing all support sessions. However, only 233 patients went on to attend the 3 months of follow-up session. Effectiveness of guided self-help clinics supported by paraprofessional mental health workers was comparable to that supported by an experienced mental health nurse. Improvements in problem severity were statistically significant, with 55% and 58% (final support session) and 63% and 62% (3 months of follow-up) of patients experiencing clinically significant and reliable change for anxiety and depression, respectively. However, concerns exist over the efficiency of the GMHW clinic especially with respect to the use of longer support sessions and high dropout rate at the 3 months of follow-up session. The paper concludes by highlighting the effectiveness of guided self-help when supported by paraprofessional mental health workers, but questions the utility of the two-plus-one model of service delivery proposing a collaborative care approach as an alternative
Cohort · Cohort study · Environmental health · Mental health · Psychiatry · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Nursing · Psychology · Gerontology · Internal Medicine
Collaborative Care Management of Late-Life Depression in the Primary Care Setting
Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Clinical significance
Access and effectiveness in psychological therapies
The Effectiveness of Time Limits in Counseling and Psychotherapy
Impact of graduate mental health workers upon primary care mental health
Primary care mental health workers
Mental Illness in the Community
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |