Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Administering the U.S. Family Violence Option

The role of stigma in waiver recommendations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12290331
AutoresKristina Nikolova (0000-0003-4387-8959, School of Social Work Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA, autor de correspondencia), Jordan J Steiner (0000-0003-1496-6036, Center on Violence Against Women and Children School of Social Work Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA), Judy L Postmus (0000-0001-7265-5864, Center on Violence Against Women and Children School of Social Work Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA), Andrea Hetling (0000-0002-7012-7336, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA), Laura Johnson (0000-0002-1882-8186, Center on Violence Against Women and Children School of Social Work Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA)
Año2020
Volumen29
Número1
Páginas66-77
Fecha de publicación2020-06-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth & Social Care in the Community (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0966-0410 • E-ISSN: 1365-2524
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hsc.13069
PMID32542929
OpenAlexW3035189942
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas46

The Family Violence Option (FVO) was designed to help survivors of domestic violence (DV) more easily secure income support in the United States (U.S.), without placing them at risk of further abuse. The objective of this study is to determine whether the decision-making of advocates responsible for determining waiver recommendations under the FVO is influenced by the relationship status of DV survivors. Recursive partitioning was used to analyse data from a sample of 237 survivor risk assessments from four New Jersey counties to determine which women receive waiver recommendations and which do not. Advocates completed risk assessments for the women and were instructed to make recommendations on waivers based on their assessment. Workers' decision-making was examined using classification and regression trees (CART) to determine what case factors made it more or less likely for survivors to be recommended waivers. The CART results were supplemented with logistic regression analyses to ensure validity. For two of three waivers, survivors who reported currently residing with their abuser or who had ended the relationship recently were less likely to receive waiver recommendations than those who had been out of the relationship for a longer period of time (OR = 0.09-0.21), even when accounting for the type and severity of DV and the impacts of the violence on survivors' mental health. The results indicate that DV advocates' decision-making is complicated by factors independent of survivors' case characteristics. This can affect the safety and well-being of women attempting to leave violent relationships by affecting their access to resources

Affect (linguistics · Domestic violence · Family medicine · Injury prevention · Logistic regression · Medical emergency · Mental health · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Political science · Psychiatry · Stigma (botany · Suicide prevention · Waiver · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

  • Can This Provider Be Trusted? A Review of the Role of Trustworthiness in the Provision of Community-Based Services for Intimate Partner Violence Survivors

    Open Access•Anne-Catherine Kennedy, Kristen A Prock et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2024

  • Experiencing the Streets

    Open Access•R Macmillan, Annette Nierobisz et al.•Journal of Research in Crime and…•2000

  • Violence against women post-separation

    Open Access•Douglas A Brownridge•Aggression and Violent Behavior•2006

  • Stalking and Intimate Partner Femicide

    Open Access•Judith Mcfarlane, Judith M Mcfarlane et al.•Homicide Studies•1999

  • Leave or Stay?

    Open Access•Jinseok Kim, Karen A Gray•Journal of Interpersonal Violence•2008

  • Understanding Economic Abuse in the Lives of Survivors

    Open Access•Judy L Postmus, Sara-Beth Plummer et al.•Journal of Interpersonal Violence•2012

  • A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Robert L Spitzer, Carmen Pérez de los Ríos et al.•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•2006

  • The CES-D Scale

    Open Access•Lenore Sawyer Radloff•Applied Psychological Measurement•1977

  • The Ideal Victim

    Open Access•Nils Christie•From Crime Policy to Victim Policy•1986

  • “I Still Feel Like I Am Not Normal”

    Open Access•Anne-Catherine Kennedy, Kristen A Prock•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2018

  • When Crises Collide

    Open Access•Lisa A Goodman, Katya Fels Smyth et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2009

  • Economic Abuse as an Invisible Form of Domestic Violence

    Open Access•Judy L Postmus, Gretchen L Hoge et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2020

  • Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support

    Open Access•Salome Meyer•Theoretical Criminology•2015

  • Welfare Caseworker Assessments and Domestic Violence Services

    Open Access•Andrea Hetling•Violence Against Women•2011

  • The Impact of Sexual Assault, Sexual Assault Perpetrator Type, and Location of Sexual Assault on Ratings of Perceived Safety

    Open Access•Kayleen A Culbertson, Peter W Vik et al.•Violence Against Women•2001

  • Impoverished Women in Violent Partnerships

    Open Access•Patricia R Cole•Violence Against Women•2001

  • The Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Low-Income Women’s Economic Well-Being

    Open Access•Adrienne E Adams, Richard M Tolman et al.•Violence Against Women•2012

  • Barriers to Domestic Violence Help Seeking

    Open Access•Michelle Fugate, Leslie Landis et al.•Violence Against Women•2005

  • With the Best of Intentions

    Open Access•Laura Lein, Susan E Jacquet et al.•Violence Against Women•2001

  • Screening for Domestic Violence in Public Welfare Offices

    Open Access•Taryn Lindhorst, Marcia Meyers et al.•Violence Against Women•2007

  • Domestic Violence Prevalence and Effects on Employment in Two California Tanf Populations

    Open Access•Joan Meisel, Daniel Chandler et al.•Violence Against Women•2003

  • Battered Women Speak Out

    Open Access•Noël Bridget Busch, Terry A Wolfer•Violence Against Women•2002

  • Systemic Obstacles to Battered Women's Participation in the Judicial System

    Open Access•J Roy Gillis, S Diamond et al.•Violence Against Women•2006

  • Barriers to accessing generic health and social care services

    Open Access•Joanne Neale, Charlotte Tompkins et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2007

  • Why Doesn't She Just Leave?”

    Open Access•Michael Anderson, Michael A Anderson et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2003

  • Battered and on Welfare

    Judy L Postmus•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•2004

  • Predicting recurrent maltreatment among high-risk families

    Open Access•Kathryn Maguire‐jack, Kathryn Maguire-Jack et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

  • Intimate Partner Violence, Welfare Receipt, and Health Status of Low‐Income African American Women

    Open Access•Mieko Yoshihama, Amy C Hammock et al.•American Journal of Community…•2006

  • Frontline Worker Responses to Domestic Violence Disclosure in Public Welfare Offices

    Taryn Lindhorst, Erin A Casey et al.•Social Work•2010

  • Disjunctures for Women and Frontline Workers

    Taryn Lindhorst, Julianna D Padgett•Social Service Review•2005

  • Intimate Partner Violence as an Obstacle to Employment Among Mothers Affected by Welfare Reform

    Open Access•Stephanie Riger, Susan L Staggs et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2004

  • World Report on Violence and Health

    Open Access•Lorraine E Ferris•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2002

  • Creating a Tool for Assessing Domestic Violence Risk and Impact Among Tanf Clients

    Open Access•Jordan J Steiner, Laura Johnson et al.•Advances in Social Work•2020

  • Heterogeneity at the Bottom

    Mary Jane Taylor, Amanda Smith Barusch et al.•Journal of Human Behavior in the…•2006

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae