The cultural roles of perforated fish vertebrae in prehistoric and historic Europe
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12371548 |
|---|---|
| Autores | D Makowiecki (0000-0002-1821-4627, Institute of Archaeology Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń Poland, autor de correspondencia), Kenneth Ritchie (0000-0001-5952-6689, Moesgaard Museum Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark), A Pluskowski (0000-0002-4494-7664, Department of Archaeology University of Reading Reading UK, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 31 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1125-1137 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1047-482X • E-ISSN: 1099-1212 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/oa.3025 |
| OpenAlex | W3181034086 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
This paper provides a new synthesis of perforated fish vertebrae in prehistoric and historic Europe, with a particular focus on Poland, within the broader context of Central and Eastern Europe. The earliest examples of such artefacts in Europe date from the Upper Palaeolithic, but compared to other ‘beads’ manufactured from animal bone, perforated fish vertebrae are rare. This paper examines the diachronic trends in the range of species that have been chosen for such objects, as well as their depositional contexts. Despite the wide range of freshwater and marine species exploited by people, only the vertebrae of a few species—especially pike and catfish—were selected for use as beads. There is a general shift from their deposition in funerary contexts in prehistoric European societies to their association as low‐status objects associated with Christian private devotion in the post‐conversion period. However, this may not reflect continuity in the use of fish vertebrae, with a shift in their symbolism after the conversion to Christianity, given the substantial chronological gaps in the archaeological record. This synthesis nonetheless provides a solid foundation for contextualising future archaeological finds of such artefacts
Archaeological record · Archaeology · Biology · Context (archaeology · Fish · Fish bone · Fishery · Geography · Pike · Prehistory · Range (aeronautics · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Engineering · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Beads of the Wielbark Culture from Khrinnyky
Breaking and Shaping Beastly Bodies
Animal remains from Neolithic Lameiras, Sintra
Sant’Antioco (SW Sardinia, Italy)
Narwhals or Unicorns? Exotic Animals as Material Culture in Medieval Europe
Bone, Antler, Ivory and Horn
Great white shark teeth used as pendants and possible tools by early-middle Holocene terrestrial mammal hunter-gatherers in the Eastern Pampas (Southern South America)
The White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) in the Ancient Peruvian Ceremonial Centre of Huaca Pucllana
A shark-tooth ornament from Pleistocene Sahul
New research at Riņņukalns, a Neolithic freshwater shell midden in northern Latvia
Perspectivism, Mortuary Symbolism, and Human-Shark Relationships on the Maritime Peninsula
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |