Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The bare bones appearance of hyperparathyroidism

Distinguishing subperiosteal bone resorption from periosteal reaction

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12371738
AutoresBruce Rothschild (0000-0003-1327-6615, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology Carnegie Museum Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA, autor de correspondencia)
Año2021
Volumen32
Número1
Páginas276-282
Fecha de publicación2021-11-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1047-482X • E-ISSN: 1099-1212
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/oa.3063
OpenAlexW3209786955
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas33

Three types of resorption (endosteal, intracortical [Haversian], and periosteal envelope [subperiosteal]) have been observed in hyperparathyroidism. The current manuscript addresses the one manifestation that seems to have specificity, subperiosteal bone resorption, and allows us to distinguish the resultant subperiosteal resorption from the unrelated accretion phenomenon, periosteal reaction. Skeletons of 2906 individuals in the Hamann‐Todd Human Skeletal Collection were visually (macroscopically) examined to identify surface resorption and tuft alterations. Surface resorption was present bilaterally in 18 of 94 individuals with renal disease‐derived hyperparathyroidism, but absent in the other 2812 individuals examined. Manual tuft resorption was present in four individuals with hyperparathyroidism and absent in all others examined. Given its limitation to individuals with known hyperparathyroidism, the presence of subperiosteal resorption appears diagnostic. The 4% prevalence of subperiosteal reaction in the Hamman‐Todd cohort with hyperparathyroidism is indistinguishable from that reported in clinical samples. Subperiosteal resorption appears be a phenomenon in the archeological record that is pathognomonic for the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism. Such biologically remodeled bone is easily distinguished from post‐mortem damage and its position subjacent to the periosteum facilitates distinguishing it from periosteal reaction. While the presence of subperiosteal bone resorption appears to have great specificity, its sensitivity is low as it was found only in 19% of individuals examined in this study

Bone resorption · Disease · Hyperparathyroidism · Pathognomonic · Pathology · Periosteum · Resorption · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Medicine · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Anatomy · Internal Medicine

  • Time resolution in fluvial vertebrate assemblages

    Open Access•Anna K Behrensmeyer•Paleobiology•1982

  • Hamann‐Todd collection aging studies

    Open Access•Robert P Mensforth, Bruce M Latimer•American Journal of Physical…•1989

  • Possible case of hyperparathyroidism in a roman period skeleton from the Dakhleh Oasis, Egypt, diagnosed using bone histomorphometry

    Open Access•Megan Cook, El Molto et al.•American Journal of Physical…•1988

  • Periosteal reaction recognition and specificity assessed by surface microscopy

    Open Access•Bruce Rothschild, Lyman Jellema et al.•International Journal of…•2020

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae