The early development of concrete in the domestic architecture of pre-Roman Pompeii

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12372588
AutoresMarcello Mogetta (0000-0003-2736-3410, University of Missouri, autor de correspondencia)
Año2016
Volumen29
Páginas43-72
Fecha de publicación2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Roman Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1047-7594 • E-ISSN: 2331-5709
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1047759400072044
OpenAlexW2540472010
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4

Because of its exceptional state of preservation, Pompeii has traditionally been viewed as an ideal site at which to study the early development of Roman architecture. Scholars have looked to the Pompeian evidence in order to provide parallels for periods and classes of buildings that in Rome are less well documented archaeologically. The focus of recent debate has been on the Mid- to Late Republican transition, with an emphasis on building types whose introduction at Pompeii would demonstrate a direct cultural link with practice at Rome. The prevailing view is that both the town-planning and the architecture of Pompeii in the 3rd-2nd c. B.C. were strongly influenced by Roman models or prototypes. Similarly, there has been a tendency to refer to the Pompeian materials as the missing link for the high dating of early Roman concrete architecture in Rome, which would have been introduced around the same period. In a recent review of the evidence from Rome, I have argued for a later chronology, which, inevitably, prompts a reconsideration of the development and cultural significance of concrete construction at Pompeii

Aesthetics · Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Chronology · Ideal (ethics · Parallels · Period (music · Political science · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Engineering · Historical and Architectural Studies · History · Law · Architecture