The Severan coin hoard from Shapwick ( JRA 14, 358-72)
A comment
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12373401 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard Reece (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2002 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Páginas | 352-352 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Roman Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1047-7594 • E-ISSN: 2331-5709 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1047759400014057 |
| OpenAlex | W2588099375 |
| Idioma | EN |
Since most coin hoards are found without any archaeological context, even when excavation after discovery is possible, prompt publication of a large hoard of denarii with its context is so unusual an event that a few extra comments and questions may be allowed. I have doubts about the comparison with the site at Frocester (Glos.). The finds there suggested the remains of an iron-bound chest, and it might be that that was a strong box. If so, it was a permanent feature but was found empty. The Shapwick hoard was deposited in a scoop in the ground and was presumably a temporary hiding-place for a sum of money which might be roughly £150,000 to £250,000 in modern terms. The hiding of the hoard would, in a sense, be more ‘normal’, and certainly more safe, if it were done within the walls of a derelict building rather than an active farm. From the archaeological details this seems to be a possibility
Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Event (particle physics · Excavation · Hoard · Physics · SCOOP · Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies · Engineering · Historical and Archaeological Studies · History · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |