Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The effects of knowledge management capabilities and partnership attributes on the stage‐based e‐business diffusion

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12420394
AutoresHsiu‐Fen Lin (0000-0003-3492-5637, National Taiwan Ocean University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen23
Número4
Páginas439-464
Fecha de publicación2013-08-08
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternet Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657
EditorialEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/intr-11-2012-0233
OpenAlexW1973576416
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas79

Purpose This study aims to develop a research model to examine the antecedents of three stages of electronic business (e‐business) diffusion (including e‐business initiation, implementation and assimilation). The research model features knowledge management (KM) capabilities (knowledge acquisition, knowledge storage, knowledge dissemination, and knowledge protection), and partnership attributes (partner interdependence, partner trust, and partner commitment) as prominent antecedents of stage‐based e‐business diffusion. Design/methodology/approach Data gathered from 398 firms were employed to test the relationships between the research model constructs using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Findings The results reveal that the factors for KM capabilities and partnership attributes have different impacts on three stages of e‐business diffusion. In particular, knowledge dissemination has a positive effect on all three e‐business diffusion stages, demonstrating its importance in the decision to shape e‐business diffusion. Moreover, the findings show that three partnership attributes are important enablers during the whole e‐business diffusion process. Practical implications In the context of e‐business, knowledge dissemination activities occur not only within firms, but also between firms and their business partners. Knowledge dissemination enables employees to develop novel solutions to problems that significantly improve on current practices. Hence, the increasing importance of the field of knowledge dissemination is primarily attributed to promotion of successful e‐business activities and increased level of e‐business implementation. Originality/value Theoretically, this study aims to provide a research model that is capable of understanding the determinants of the stage‐based e‐business diffusion. From a managerial perspective, the findings of this study provide valuable guidelines to policy‐makers and practitioners in implementing e‐business and accelerating e‐business diffusion

Business · Business process · Context (archaeology · Diffusion · General partnership · Knowledge management · Structural equation modeling · Computer Science · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Marketing

  • Adaptive management reporting system in inter-organizational relations of agricultural enterprises according to ESG principles

    L I Khoruzhy, Yuriy N Katkov et al.

  • The Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs) on Knowledge Management Using Integrated Innovation Diffusion Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model

    Ibrahim Youssef Alyoussef

  • An empirical assessment of the antecedents of electronic-business implementation and the resulting organizational performance

    Open Access•Mahmoud Mohammad Migdadi, Mohammed Khair Saleem Abu Zaid et al.•Internet Research•2016

  • SNS use reduction

    Open Access•Joana Neves, Ofir Turel et al.•Internet Research•2022

  • Entrepreneurs adoption of information system innovation

    Sedigheh Moghavvemi, Noor Akma Mohd Salleh et al.

  • Enablers and inhibitors of cloud computing assimilation

    Nianxin Wang, Huigang Liang et al.

  • Towards a conceptual model for examining the impact of knowledge management factors on mobile learning acceptance

    Open Access•Mostafa Al-Emran, Vitaliy Mezhuyev et al.•Technology in Society•2020

  • Knowledge Management

    Andrew H Gold, Arvind Malhotra et al.•Journal of Management Information…•2001

  • The Performance of ML, GLS, and WLS Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling Under Conditions of Misspecification and Nonnormality

    Ulf Olsson, Ulf Henning Olsson et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2000

  • Two Structural Equation Models

    Claes Fornell, Fred L Bookstein•Journal of Marketing Research•1982

  • Two Structural Equation Models

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, Fred L Bookstein•Journal of Marketing Research•1982

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.

    Patrick J Curran, Stephen G West et al.•Psychological Methods•1996

  • Empirically testing innovation characteristics and organizational learning capabilities in e‐business implementation success

    Open Access•Hsiu‐Fen Lin•Internet Research•2008

  • Innovation and Learning

    Wesley M Cohen, Daniel A Levinthal•The Economic Journal•1989

Citas por año0,7
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2022 (7)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae