Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Citizen engagement in co-creation of e-government services

A process theory view from a meta-synthesis approach

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12420737
AutoresAnupriya Khan (0000-0002-4751-5875, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, autor de correspondencia), Satish Krishnan (0000-0002-5538-4764, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)
Año2021
Volumen31
Número4
Páginas1318-1375
Fecha de publicación2021-02-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternet Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1066-2243 • E-ISSN: 2054-5657
EditorialEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/intr-03-2020-0116
OpenAlexW3127346447
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas17
Referencias citadas112

Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop an in-depth understanding of the overall process of facilitating co-creation of e-government services, focusing on the government's role in fostering citizen engagement. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies encompassing analyses on a case-specific level followed by syntheses on a cross-study level. Findings Through meta-synthesis, the study developed an integrated framework, the process theory view of enabling co-creation of e-government services, illustrating how co-creation could be initiated and facilitated by the government. Research limitations/implications By providing critical insights into co-creation steps, the process theory view offers a holistic theoretical understanding of enabling co-creation by identifying factors driving and motivating governments to initiate co-creation activities, interpreting the prerequisites for co-creation and the importance of impact assessment. Practical implications This study offers important implications for public authorities, administrators and policymakers by helping them enhance their knowledge base on the co-creation process to facilitate a higher level of collaboration between citizens and government for effective and efficient public service delivery through e-government. Originality/value While it is widely acknowledged that citizen engagement is crucial for improving and transforming the development and delivery of e-government services, it is equally recognized as a challenging and complex task. Through a meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies, this study is one of the first to develop a process theory view for offering a holistic understanding and crucial insights for addressing the concerns over the co-creation of e-government services

Business · Co-Creation · Government (linguistics · Knowledge management · Originality · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Qualitative research · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Sociology · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Public Policy and Administration Research · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Marketing

  • Technological infrastructure and financial resource availability in enhancing public services and government performance

    Open Access•Ratih Purnamasari, Agus Ismaya Hasanudin et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Toward a better digital society

    Ayushi Agarwal, M P Sebastian et al.•Internet Research•2026

  • Assessing the drivers of the regional digital divide and their impact on eGovernment services

    Open Access•Mónica Pazmiño-Sarango, Mijail Naranjo-Zolotov et al.•Information Technology and People•2022

  • Vision and reality of e-government for governance improvement

    Open Access•Qi Zou, Zijun Mao et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Electronic government and corruption

    Open Access•Anupriya Khan, Satish Krishnan et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • How perceived social support encourages citizen coproduction

    Open Access•Mingxing Ma, Jing Tan•International Review of…•2026

  • Designing inclusive co-creation

    Open Access•Loes Reijnders, Koen Verhoest et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • The Role of User Value Co-Creation Behavior on Service Delivery Performance of Union Digital Center in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Zijun Mao, B Biswas et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Visiting and exploring digital transformation management

    Jyoti Choudrie, John Oredo et al.•Internet Research•2025

  • The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance

    Open Access•Stephen Mccarthy, Wendy Rowan et al.•Internet Research•2023

  • Unlocking Governance for Sustainability in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Yan Luan, Qing Guan et al.•Sustainable Development•2026

  • The Cyberfare State

    Open Access•Roland Kelemen•Frontiers in Political Science•2026

  • Citizens’ trust and digital attitudes

    Open Access•Zhang Yang•Public Administration and Policy•2023

  • The Impact of Organizational Media Performance on Social Media Management

    Ayoub Yousif Ali Ramadhan Al-Ali, Muslimin Wallang et al.•Journal of Namibian Studies…•2023

  • Engaging with deepfakes

    Open Access•Pramukh Nanjundaswamy Vasist, Satish Krishnan•Internet Research•2022

  • Impact of e-government on citizen engagement

    Open Access•Toan Khanh Tran Pham, Quyen Le Hoang Thuy To Nguyen•Journal of Information…•2024

  • Ethical implications of using AI for knowledge creation

    Siddharth Madhav Joshi, Satish Krishnan et al.•Journal of Information…•2026

  • Leading public sector innovation

    Christian Bason•Leading Public Sector Innovation•2010

  • From public service-dominant logic to public service logic

    Stephen P Osborne•Public Management Review•2018

  • Evidence in Management and Organizational Science

    Denise M Rousseau, Joshua Manning et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2008

  • Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government

    Marijn Janssen, Yannis Charalabidis et al.•Information Systems Management•2012

  • Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services

    Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•Public Management Review•2016

  • Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Ethan Seltzer, Dillon Mahmoudi•Journal of Planning Literature•2013

  • On the definition of feedback

    Open Access•Arkalgud Ramaprasad•Systems Research and Behavioral…•1983

  • Persuasion With Case Studies

    Nicolaj Siggelkow•Academy of Management Journal•2007

  • A theory of organizational readiness for change

    Open Access•Bryan J Weiner•Implementation Science•2009

  • Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature

    Open Access•Salla Atkins, Simon Lewin et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2008

  • Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research

    Open Access•Denis Walsh, Soo Downe•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2005

  • Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies

    Open Access•Christina Hoon•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    W H Voorberg, V J J M Bekkers et al.•Public Management Review•2015

  • Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

    Open Access•David Tranfield, David Denyer et al.•British Journal of Management•2003

  • The process of reinventing a job

    Open Access•Alessandra Lazazzara, Maria Tims et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2020

  • Internet addiction

    Open Access•Alecia C Douglas, Juline E Mills et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2008

  • Utilization of open government data

    Open Access•Igbal Safarov, Albert Meijer et al.•Information Polity•2017

  • Assessing US Government bulletin boards

    Open Access•John Carlo Bertot, Charles R McClure•Internet Research•1994

  • E-government development and the digital economy

    Open Access•Fang Zhao, Joe Wallis et al.•Internet Research•2015

  • Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e‐government services

    Open Access•Christos Halaris, Babis Magoutas et al.•Internet Research•2007

  • Evaluating the performance of e-government in developing countries

    Open Access•Hepu Deng, Kanishka Karunasena et al.•Internet Research•2017

  • Collaborative digital government in Mexico

    Open Access•Luis F Luna‐reye, Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2007

  • Engendering inclusive e-government use through citizen IT training programs

    Open Access•Jae Bok Lee, Gregory A Porumbescu•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities

    Open Access•Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia•Government Information Quarterly•2011

  • How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago's food inspection forecasting model

    Open Access•Keegan Mcbride, Gerli Aavik et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Explaining value co-creation and co-destruction in e-government using boundary object theory

    Open Access•Elin Uppström, Carl-Mikael Lönn•Government Information Quarterly•2017

  • Public e-service development

    Open Access•Jesper Holgersson, Fredrik Karlsson•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • Why E-participation systems fail

    Open Access•Maarja Toots•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • The multiple meanings of open government data

    Open Access•Felipe González-Zapata, Richard Heeks•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development

    Open Access•Fredrik Karlsson, Jesper Holgersson et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Promoting the use of open government data

    Open Access•Mila Gascó-Hernández, Erika G Martins et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement

    Open Access•Gwanhoo Lee, Young Hoon Kwak•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Co-creating an open platform at the local governance level

    Open Access•Vasiliki Baka•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Public Value Management

    Open Access•Gerry Stoker•The American Review of Public…•2006

  • Public Value Governance

    Open Access•John M Bryson, Barbara C Crosby et al.•Public Administration Review•2014

  • The Quadrivium of Online Public Consultation

    John Macnamara, Jim Macnamara•Australian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Barriers to innovating with open government data

    Open Access•Göran Smith, Johan Sandberg•Information Polity•2018

  • Public information strategies

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer et al.•Information Polity•2009

  • Visualizing Aedes aegypti infestation in urban areas

    Patricia Graziely Antunes De Mendonça, Cristiano Maciel et al.•Information Polity•2015

  • Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data

    Open Access•Mashael Khayyat, Frank Bannister•Information Polity•2017

  • Requirements engineering for e-Government services

    Open Access•Lex Van Velsen, Thea Van Der Geest et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2009

  • Transparencia, participación ciudadana y gobierno electrónico

    Open Access•Abraham Paniagua Vázquez, José Eduardo Borunda Escobedo et al.•Sociedade e Cultura•2012

Obras citantes distintas17
Citas por año3,4
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 17
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae