Do scores from risk measures matter to jurors

Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

• Violence Risk Assessment with the HCR-20 V3 in Legal Contexts

  Open Access•Vivienne de Vogel, Tamara De Beuf et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2022

  Añadir item

• Venire jurors’ perceptions of adversarial allegiance

  Nicholas Scurich, Daniel A Krau et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2015

  Añadir item

• Improving risk assessments for sex offenders

  R Karl Hanson, David Thornton et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2000

  Añadir item

• Civilly committed sex offenders

  Julia E McLawsen, Mario J Scalora et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2012

  Añadir item

• Field validity of the STATIC-99 and MnSost-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators

  Marcus T Boccaccini, Daniel C Murrie et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2009

  Añadir item

• Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators

  Richard Wollert•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2006

  Añadir item

• The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing

  Daniel A Krau, Bruce D Sales•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001

  Añadir item

• Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions

  Lora M Levett, Margaret Bull Kovera•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2009

  Añadir item

• Dangerously misunderstood

  Daniel A Krau, John G Mccabe et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2012

  Añadir item