Toward the Development of Reporting Standards for Evaluations
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470638 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead (0000-0001-8566-0347, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA, autor de correspondencia), James C Griffith (0000-0002-4911-4223, Claremont Evaluation Center, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Volumen | 38 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 577-602 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-04-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214017699275 |
| OpenAlex | W2607218018 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 48 |
This article first makes a case for the need to establish evaluation reporting standards, support for which is rooted in the growing demand for professionalization, in the growing metaevaluation literature, and in growing efforts to develop reporting standards for inquiry efforts. Then, a case is made for a particular set of such standards introduced in this article—the CHecklist for Evaluation-Specific Standards (CHESS). In doing so, this article outlines the process used and presents the resulting checklist and associated standards, which are defined as the minimum, evaluation-specific elements that must be reported to make judgments about the quality of the evaluation. This article also describes a few of the categories to offer illustrative information to help readers better understand and consider the usefulness of the proposed checklist. A discussion of CHESS, including challenges and next steps, is also included
Checklist · Evaluation methods · Management science · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Professionalization · Program evaluation · Quality (philosophy · Set (abstract data type · Standardization · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology
Context matters
Whose and what values? Advancing and illustrating explicit specification of evaluative criteria in education
The Super Six Ideas Shaping Evaluation in Australia
How Do You Define Success? Evaluative Criteria for Informal STEM Education
Reporting Lines of Inquiry
The forgotten contexts of evaluation
So What Do You Do? Exploring Evaluator Descriptions of Their Work
Considering Unintended Consequences
Consort 2010 Statement
Evaluation
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
Evaluation as a discipline
A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009
A Review and Synthesis of Current Research on Cross-Cultural Evaluation
Practical Training in Evaluation
Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions
Author Guidelines for Manuscripts Reporting on Qualitative Research
How Legitimate and Justified are Judgments in Program Evaluation
The Strength of the Methodological Warrants for the Findings of Research on Program Evaluation Use
The State of the Empirical Research Literature on Stakeholder Involvement in Program Evaluation
Insight Into Evaluation Practice
An Empirical Examination of Validity in Evaluation
A Research Synthesis of the Evaluation Capacity Building Literature
Evaluation Theory is Who We Are
Research on Evaluation Use
The Nature and Frequency of Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Program Evaluation
The Metaevaluation Imperative
Taking Stock of Empowerment Evaluation
University-Based Evaluation Training Programs in the United States 1980—2008
Evaluator Competencies
Encyclopedia of Evaluation
Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline
Evaluation Research
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |