Introducing Evidence-Based Principles to Guide Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation
Results of an Empirical Process
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470639 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lyn M Shulha (Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada), Elizabeth Whitmore (0000-0002-7181-6715, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, autor de correspondencia), J Bradley Cousins (0000-0002-0684-6766, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada), Nathalie Gilbert (University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada), Hind Al Hudib (0000-0003-2514-1945, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 193-215 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214015615230 |
| OpenAlex | W2253092986 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 40 |
| Referencias citadas | 27 |
This article introduces a set of evidence-based principles to guide evaluation practice in contexts where evaluation knowledge is collaboratively produced by evaluators and stakeholders. The data from this study evolved in four phases: two pilot phases exploring the desirability of developing a set of principles; an online questionnaire survey that drew on the expertise of 320 practicing evaluators to identify dimensions, factors or characteristics that enhance or impede success in collaborative approaches in evaluation (CAE); and finally a validation phase involving a subsample of 58 evaluators who participated in the main phase. The principles introduced here stem from the experiences of evaluators who have engaged in CAE in a wide variety of evaluation settings and contexts and the lessons they have learned. They are understood to be interconnected and loosely temporally ordered. We expect the principles to evolve over time, as evaluators learn more about collaborative approaches in context. With this in mind, we pose questions for consideration to stimulate further inquiry
Context (archaeology · Data science · Knowledge management · Management science · Set (abstract data type · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Artificial Intelligence
A Core Components Framework for Evaluating Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education Programs
Creating a Resilient Ecosystem for the Employment of Autistic Individuals
It’s a Marathon, Not a Sprint
Representing the values of program participants
A community mental health organization’s use of decision support dashboards for indicator monitoring
Reflections on the Intersections Between Collaboration and Use in Evaluation Practice
From the Co-Editors
A Protocol for Participatory Data Use
Finding common ground
Advancing an ethical imperative for collaborative approaches to evaluation with low incidence and underserved communities
Wraparound programmes for pregnant and parenting women with substance use concerns in Canada
A collaborative, mixed‐methods evaluation of a low‐cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry
National Evaluation of Canadian Multi-Service Fasd Prevention Programs
Multi-Service Programs for Pregnant and Parenting Women with Substance Use Concerns
Conceptualizing the Dimensions of Organizational Evaluation Capacity in Art Museums
Reimagining Visitor Studies
Evaluation Capacity Building
Une collaboration recherche-pratique pour améliorer l’organisation des services aux enfants ayant un retard de développement
Behind the Virtual Curtain
Stakeholder involvement in realist evaluation
The evaluation of social innovation
Mapping Evaluation Use
Ripple Effects Mapping Within a Process Evaluation of Sport for Development Provision in England
Co-production and arts-informed inquiry as creative power for knowledge mobilisation
Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation
Interorganizational evaluation capacity building in the public, health and community sectors
Evaluación de Programas Públicos de Gobernanza Colaborativa
Principles for Stakeholder Involvement in Evaluation in Latin America
You Get the Great Feeling That You’re Being Heard But in the End You Realize That Things Will Be Done Differently and in Others’ Favor”
Developing Evaluation Approaches for an Anti-Human Trafficking Housing Program
Research and Evaluation With Community-Based Projects
Theory-Practice Connections in Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation
Enabling Young People’s Involvement in Research
Making Space for Adaptive Learning
Gatekeeping's Influence on Equitable Evaluation Practice
Introducing Q Methodology to Program Evaluators
Developing and testing a readiness tool for interpersonal violence prevention partnerships with community‐based projects
L'élaboration et la mise en œuvre des recommandations issues d'évaluations de programmes au gouvernement du Canada
Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government
Capacitação para o controle da hanseníase
The Case for Participatory Evaluation
Reconceptualizing evaluation use
Framing participatory evaluation
Principles for Participatory Action Research
Action Research
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Advancing Empirical Scholarship to Further Develop Evaluation Theory and Practice
Let There Be Light
Research on Evaluation Use
Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation
Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation
The transformatory potential of a village empowerment program
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA)
| Obras citantes distintas | 40 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 40 |