Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation

The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12470913
AutoresDavid Campbell (0000-0003-0525-8150, Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec, Canada,, autor de correspondencia), Michelle Picard-Aitken (Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec, Canada), Grégoire Côté (0000-0002-6168-6507, Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec, Canada), Julie Caruso (0000-0002-3033-5974, Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec, Canada), Rodolfo Valentim (Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Stuart Edmonds (Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Gregory Thomas Williams (Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Benoît Macaluso (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Jean-Pierre Robitaille (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Nicolas Bastien (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Marie-Claude Laframboise (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Louis-Michel Lebeau (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Philippe Mirabel (Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Vincent Larivière (0000-0002-2733-0689, Observatoire des sciences et des technologies (OST), Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, Québec, Canada), Eric Archambault (0000-0002-4422-1054, Science-Metrix, Montréal, Québec, Canada)
Año2010
Volumen31
Número1
Páginas66-83
Fecha de publicación2010-01-12
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1098214009354774
OpenAlexW2169058265
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas13
Referencias citadas19

As bibliometric indicators are objective, reliable, and cost-effective measures of peer-reviewed research outputs, they are expected to play an increasingly important role in research assessment/management. Recently, a bibliometric approach was developed and integrated within the evaluation framework of research funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC). This approach helped address the following questions that were difficult to answer objectively using alternative methods such as program documentation review and key informant interviews: (a) Has the NCIC peer-review process selected outstanding Canadian scientists in cancer research? (b) Have the NCIC grants contributed to increasing the scientific performance of supported researchers? (c) How do the NCIC-supported researchers compare to their neighbors supported by the U.S. National Cancer Institute? Using the NCIC evaluation as a case study, this article demonstrates the usefulness of bibliometrics to address key evaluation questions and discusses its integration, along complementary indicators (e.g., peer ratings), in a practice-driven research evaluation continuum

Bibliometrics · Documentation · Library science · Management science · Medical education · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Research Data Management Practices · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Social innovation research

    Open Access•Robert P van der Have, Robert van der Have et al.•Research Policy•2016

  • Alternativas de materiais e processos mais sustentáveis para a indústria têxtil atual

    Open Access•Ana Paula Provin, Anelise Leal Vieira Cubas et al.•Modapalavra e-periódico•2021

  • A bibliometric review of Teaching and Teacher Education

    Open Access•Sumeyra Dogan Coskun•Teaching and Teacher Education•2026

  • An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases

    Open Access•Dušan Nikolić, Dragan Ivanović et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Research funding in different SCI disciplines

    Open Access•Wencan Tian, Ruonan Cai et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • The Arabic Citation Index

    Open Access•Jamal El-Ouahi•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Governing Science

    Open Access•Jochen Gläser, Grit Laudel•European Journal of Sociology•2016

  • Social Innovation

    Open Access•Liliya Satalkina, Gerald Steiner•Minerva•2022

  • Using Citation Analysis Methods to Assess the Influence of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Evaluations

    Open Access•Lija O Greenseid, Frances Lawrenz•American Journal of Evaluation•2011

  • On the very idea of pursuitworthiness

    Open Access•Jamie Shaw•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • The marginalization of the Arab language in social science

    Open Access•Sari Hanafi, Rigas Arvanitis•Current Sociology•2014

  • Decoding the Trends and the Emerging Research Directions of Digital Tourism in the Last Three Decades

    Open Access•Prateek Kalia, Dušan Mladenović et al.•SAGE Open•2022

  • Research Performance Evaluation in China

    Open Access•Guangchao Charles Feng•SAGE Open•2020

  • Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus

    Open Access•Eric Archambault, David Campbell et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2009

  • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

    Open Access•Per O Seglen•BMJ•1997

  • The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives

    Open Access•William M K Trochim, William M Trochim et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2008

Obras citantes distintas13
Citas por año0,87
Intervalo de citas2011 - 2026 (16)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae