Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System Evaluation Theory (SET)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12470924 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ralph Renger (0000-0002-0224-1444, Just Evaluation Services, LLC, Vail, AZ, USA, autor de correspondencia), Jessica Renger (0000-0002-5120-9504, Claremont Graduate University, CA, USA), Marc D Basson (0000-0001-9696-2789, University of North Dakota), Richard Van Eck (0000-0002-9826-9774, University of North Dakota), Jirina Renger (Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Eric Souvannasacd (0000-0003-3027-8612, University of North Dakota), Gary Hart (University of North Dakota) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 42 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 586-601 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-10-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214020986619 |
| PMID | 34966242 |
| OpenAlex | W3206979120 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
This article shares lessons learned in applying system evaluation theory (SET) to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) funded by the National Institutes of Health. After describing how CTR support cores are intended to work interdependently as a system, the case is made for SET as the best fit for evaluating this evaluand. The article then details how the evaluation was also challenged to facilitate a CTR culture shift, helping support cores to move from working autonomously to working together and understanding how the cores' individual operating processes impact each other. This was achieved by incorporating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) building block approach to implement SET. Each of the seven HSEEP building blocks is examined for alignment with each of SET's three steps and the ability to systematically support the goal of moving CTR cores toward working interdependently. The implications of using HSEEP to support SET implementation for future evaluations are discussed
Block (permutation group theory · Core (optical fiber · Homeland security · Operations research · Process management · Program evaluation · Set (abstract data type · Telecommunications · Work (physics · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment
The Science of Evaluation
Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science
Good Visions, Bad Micro-management and Ugly Ambiguity
How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?
Systems thinking
Process Flow Mapping for Systems Improvement
Comparing and Contrasting a Program versus System Approach to Evaluation
Systems thinking and evaluation
System evaluation theory (SET)
Lessons learned in evaluating the infrastructure of a Centre for Translational Research
Defining Systems to Evaluate System Efficiency and Effectiveness
Evaluating System Cascading Failures
Illustrating the Evaluation of System Feedback Mechanisms Using System Evaluation Theory (SET)
Member Checking
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,22 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |