Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Principal Stratification

A Tool for Understanding Variation in Program Effects Across Endogenous Subgroups

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12470973
AutoresLindsay C Page (0000-0001-5932-6791, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, autor de correspondencia), Avi Feller (0000-0001-7319-5468, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA), Todd Grindal (0009-0005-8461-5508, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA, USA), Luke W Miratrix (0000-0002-0078-1906, Harvard University Press), Luke Miratrix (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA), Marie-Andree Somers (MDRC, Los Angeles, CA, USA), Marie‐Andrée Somers (0000-0002-8079-2305, Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation)
Año2015
Volumen36
Número4
Páginas514-531
Fecha de publicación2015-07-28
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1098214015594419
OpenAlexW2252647298
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas47

Increasingly, researchers are interested in questions regarding treatment-effect variation across partially or fully latent subgroups defined not by pretreatment characteristics but by postrandomization actions. One promising approach to address such questions is principal stratification. Under this framework, a researcher defines endogenous subgroups, or principal strata, based on post-randomization behaviors under both the observed and the counterfactual experimental conditions. These principal strata give structure to such research questions and provide a framework for determining estimation strategies to obtain desired effect estimates. This article provides a nontechnical primer to principal stratification. We review selected applications to highlight the breadth of substantive questions and methodological issues that this method can inform. We then discuss its relationship to instrumental variables analysis to address binary noncompliance in an experimental context and highlight how the framework can be generalized to handle more complex posttreatment patterns. We emphasize the counterfactual logic fundamental to principal stratification and the key assumptions that render analytic challenges more tractable. We briefly discuss technical aspects of estimation procedures, providing a short guide for interested readers

Causal inference · Context (archaeology · Counterfactual thinking · Data science · Econometrics · Economics · Geography · Management science · Principal (computer security · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

  • Model Estimation Approaches for Fully-Latent Principal Stratification with Small Samples

    Soo‐yong Lee, Adam Sales et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2024

  • Variance Estimation in Evaluations With No-Shows

    Open Access•Daniel Litwok, Laura R Peck•American Journal of Evaluation•2018

  • Race, Resources, and Representation

    Open Access•Natália Bueno, Natália S Bueno et al.•World Politics•2017

  • Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences

    Guido W Imbens, Donald B Rubin•Causal Inference in Statistics,…•2015

  • Design of Observational Studies

    Open Access•Paul R Rosenbaum•Design of Observational Studies•2010

  • Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data

    Donald B Rubin•Journal of the American…•1980

  • Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools

    Atila Abdulkadiroğlu, Joshua D Angrist et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2011

  • Training, Wages, and Sample Selection

    David S Lee•The Review of Economic Studies•2009

  • Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes

    Donald B Rubin•Journal of the American…•2005

  • Principal Stratification in Causal Inference

    Open Access•Constantine Frangakis, Constantine E Frangakis et al.•Biometrics•2002

  • Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs

    Open Access•Howard S Bloom•Evaluation Review•1984

  • On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9

    Jerzy Splawa-Neyman, D M Dabrowska et al.•Statistical Science•1990

  • Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators

    Alberto Abadie•The Review of Economic Studies•2005

  • Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects

    Donald B Rubin•The Annals of Statistics•1978

  • Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm

    Open Access•A P Dempster, N M Laird et al.•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1977

  • Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables

    Joshua D Angrist, Guido W Imbens et al.•Journal of the American…•1996

  • Commentary

    Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2011

  • On Analysis of Symmetrically Predicted Endogenous Subgroups

    Open Access•Laura R Peck•American Journal of Evaluation•2013

  • Subgroup Analysis in Social Experiments

    Open Access•Laura R Peck•American Journal of Evaluation•2003

  • School vouchers and academic performance

    Open Access•William G Howell, Patrick J Wolf et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2002

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,33
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2024 (8)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae