Reexamining Shifting ROC Positions on the Sovereignty of the Ryukyus (1943–1972)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12498121 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ryota Hiyane (Shanghai International Studies University), Long Piao (0000-0002-9509-3152, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 73-82 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-02-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Pacific Focus (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1225-4657 • E-ISSN: 1976-5118 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pafo.70016 |
| OpenAlex | W7127294852 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 27 |
This study reexamines the position and policies of the Republic of China (ROC, Taiwan) towards the Ryukyus in the period from the 1943 Cairo Conference to the 1971 Okinawa Reversion Agreement. In order to do so, this research focuses on international politics and domestic society to look for determinants of shifts in the ROC position. The results show that the ROC position towards the Ryukyus was shifted between passive and assertive positions, mainly depending on external factors. The study identifies four decisive factors defining ROC positions and policy: (1) the international status of the ROC government; (2) the ROC policy of military recovery of mainland China; (3) the focus in the international sphere on the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) sovereignty dispute; and (4) Taiwan's domestic popular opinion. Finally, the paper identifies factors that help explain the shift in the ROC position towards the sovereignty of the Ryukyus. This paper has shown that ROC policy tended to be more assertive when the international status of the ROC was stable, when the policy of military recovery of the mainland was in question, when the international focus on the Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) sovereignty dispute was low, and when ROC domestic public opinion on the issue was strong. Conversely, under conditions of instability in the ROC's international status, strong support for the recovery of the mainland policy, spikes in the Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) controversy in the international sphere, and domestic weak public interest in the issue, policy tended to become passive
China · Foreign policy · International relations · Mainland China · Politics · Position (finance · Sovereignty · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Japanese History and Culture
Inter-Korean Relations
Navigating Security Interests and Historical Legacies
East Asia's Relations
The Politics of Imagining Asia
Power Shift' in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Incident in 2010
Can Okinawa be the “catalyst” for peace in East Asia
Animosity Toward the Japanese Rising Sun Flag in South Korea
North Korea's Nuclear Strategy
The Excavation of the Remains of Soldiers Killed in the Korean War
Rewriting the Legacy of Chiang Kai-shek on the Diaoyu Islands
Popular culture and politics
International relations from the margins
Embodying the state differently in a Westphalian world
Stabilization of Anti-U.S. Military Bases Sentiment
Navigating the US–China Rivalry
Beyond Hedging? Japanese and South Korean Responses to US–China Competition
Why Did Trump Start a Trade War with China? Revised Populism of Political Newcomers and US Foreign Policy toward China
The Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea and Implications for the Two Koreas' Economic Cooperation
Can Okinawa Escape the “Sacrificial System”? – Examining the Intersection of Collective Memory and Politics
Lack of Resolve or Military Infeasibility? Explaining Reduced Punishments during the 1936 Rhineland Crisis and the 2010 Shelling of Yeonpyeong Island
To Hedge or Not to Hedge
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |