Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Reexamining Shifting ROC Positions on the Sovereignty of the Ryukyus (1943–1972)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12498121
AutoresRyota Hiyane (Shanghai International Studies University), Long Piao (0000-0002-9509-3152, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Volumen41
Número1
Páginas73-82
Fecha de publicación2026-02-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPacific Focus (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1225-4657 • E-ISSN: 1976-5118
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/pafo.70016
OpenAlexW7127294852
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas27

This study reexamines the position and policies of the Republic of China (ROC, Taiwan) towards the Ryukyus in the period from the 1943 Cairo Conference to the 1971 Okinawa Reversion Agreement. In order to do so, this research focuses on international politics and domestic society to look for determinants of shifts in the ROC position. The results show that the ROC position towards the Ryukyus was shifted between passive and assertive positions, mainly depending on external factors. The study identifies four decisive factors defining ROC positions and policy: (1) the international status of the ROC government; (2) the ROC policy of military recovery of mainland China; (3) the focus in the international sphere on the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) sovereignty dispute; and (4) Taiwan's domestic popular opinion. Finally, the paper identifies factors that help explain the shift in the ROC position towards the sovereignty of the Ryukyus. This paper has shown that ROC policy tended to be more assertive when the international status of the ROC was stable, when the policy of military recovery of the mainland was in question, when the international focus on the Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) sovereignty dispute was low, and when ROC domestic public opinion on the issue was strong. Conversely, under conditions of instability in the ROC's international status, strong support for the recovery of the mainland policy, spikes in the Senkakus (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) controversy in the international sphere, and domestic weak public interest in the issue, policy tended to become passive

China · Foreign policy · International relations · Mainland China · Politics · Position (finance · Sovereignty · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Japanese History and Culture

  • Inter-Korean Relations

    Sheena Chestnut Greitens Greitens•Korea Observer - Institute of…•2025

  • Navigating Security Interests and Historical Legacies

    Marco Milani Milani•Korea Observer - Institute of…•2025

  • East Asia's Relations

    Steve Chan, Weixing Hu•Korea Observer - Institute of…•2025

  • The Politics of Imagining Asia

    Hui Wang, Theodore Huters•Politics of Imagining Asia•2011

  • Power Shift' in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Incident in 2010

    Linus Hagström•The Chinese Journal of…•2012

  • Can Okinawa be the “catalyst” for peace in East Asia

    Arasaki Moriteru•Inter-Asia Cultural Studies•2014

  • Animosity Toward the Japanese Rising Sun Flag in South Korea

    Open Access•Hyoung‐kyu Chey, Jaeho Jeon•Pacific Focus•2024

  • North Korea's Nuclear Strategy

    Open Access•Inseok Yoo•Pacific Focus•2024

  • The Excavation of the Remains of Soldiers Killed in the Korean War

    Open Access•Jiwon Yun, Ji‐won Yun•Pacific Focus•2024

  • Rewriting the Legacy of Chiang Kai-shek on the Diaoyu Islands

    Xiang Zhai•Journal of Contemporary China•2015

  • Popular culture and politics

    Open Access•Lhm Ling, Mari Nakamura•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • International relations from the margins

    Open Access•Ching-Chang Chen, K Shimizu•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • Embodying the state differently in a Westphalian world

    Open Access•Nina C Krickel-Choi, Ching-Chang Chen et al.•Third World Quarterly•2024

  • Stabilization of Anti-U.S. Military Bases Sentiment

    Open Access•Ryota Hiyane, Long Piao•Armed Forces & Society•2025

  • Navigating the US–China Rivalry

    Open Access•Xinlei Zhao•Pacific Focus•2025

  • Beyond Hedging? Japanese and South Korean Responses to US–China Competition

    Ramon Pacheco Pardo, Rei Koga et al.•Asian Survey•2025

  • Why Did Trump Start a Trade War with China? Revised Populism of Political Newcomers and US Foreign Policy toward China

    Open Access•Jeongeun Ahn•Pacific Focus•2025

  • The Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea and Implications for the Two Koreas' Economic Cooperation

    Open Access•Sun-Hye Heo, Sunhye Heo•Pacific Focus•2025

  • Can Okinawa Escape the “Sacrificial System”? – Examining the Intersection of Collective Memory and Politics

    Open Access•Miyoung Kim, M I Jin Kim et al.•Pacific Focus•2025

  • Lack of Resolve or Military Infeasibility? Explaining Reduced Punishments during the 1936 Rhineland Crisis and the 2010 Shelling of Yeonpyeong Island

    Open Access•Yang Gyu Kim•Pacific Focus•2025

  • To Hedge or Not to Hedge

    Mehtap Kara•Asian Survey•2025

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae