Democracy for the rescue—of dictators? The role of regime type in civil war interventions

Intrastate conflicts, long eclipsing interstate conflicts, are often internationalized. This paper examines internationalized intrastate conflicts through the types of both the intervening and the embattled regimes. Do democracies, more or less than autocracies, support autocratic governments in their fights against rebels? This paper tests three hypotheses: (1) democracies support autocrats fighting rebels less than autocracies do. (2) Democracies support democratic governments fighting against rebels more than autocracies do. (3) The more democratic two states are, the higher the probability one would support the other’s fight against rebels. Covering all documented external support in intrastate wars (1975–2000), our findings support hypothesis one and two only partly and confirm hypothesis three. However, comparing the two major accounts of the Democratic Peace theory (DPT)—the normative and the structural—our findings corroborate only the former robustly. The paper thus helps enriching the insights of the DPT beyond interstate conflicts

Autocracy · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Psychological intervention · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology

• Do Democracies Support Violent Non-governmental Organizations Less Than Autocracies Do

  Shlomo Ogen Goldman, Ogen Goldman•Civil Wars•2016

  Añadir item

• New directions for African security

  Open Access•Toni Haastrup, Hylke Dijkstra•Arms Control•2017

  Añadir item

• To Intervene or Not to Intervene? Democratic Constraints on Third-Party Support in Civil Wars

  Open Access•Casper Sakstrup, Jakob Tolstrup•Government and Opposition•2022

  Añadir item