Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Divergent tracks

Korean Government Railways’ employment and training systems under Japanese colonial rule, 1910–45

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12562012
AutoresChaisung Lim (Rikkyo University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen34
Número3
Páginas609-627
Fecha de publicación2024-03-11
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1356-1863 • E-ISSN: 1474-0591
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1356186323000597
OpenAlexW4392659096
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas4

This study employs annual reports, time-series statistics, and internal training records of the colonial-era Korean Government Railways (KGR) to conduct a quantitative analysis of its labour management practices. It addresses the colonial characteristics associated with Japanese techno-imperialism beyond ethnic discrimination, revealing a dual-pronged labour strategy that adopted a Japanese government employee system to manage middle- and upper-level personnel and directly recruited on-site workers for the lower echelons. This deviates from the low rates of local employment in Western colonies, particularly self-governing British territories or integrated French territories. In contrast, KGR's employment practices demonstrated economic and ethnic inequalities. It predominantly made Koreans on-site labourers, whereas Japanese not only held similar roles, but also occupied upper- and middle-management positions. Worker mobility, particularly among Japanese employees, grew following the outbreak of war between Japan and the USA, leading to the mass external recruitment of Koreans and the expansion of internal education to alleviate labour shortages. Nevertheless, preferential treatment toward Japanese individuals, which had been in relative decline for promotion, wages, and admission rates to training schools, ultimately persisted. Understanding KGR's employment structure shows how colonisation mediated Korea's modernisation and imposed technical limitations on the management of local labour. National technological decolonisation thus required Koreans to further introduce external technologies after the end of Japan's imperial reign

Colonialism · Demographic economics · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Government (linguistics · Modernization theory · Political science · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy

  • The tentacles of progress

    Daniel R Headrick•The tentacles of progress•1988

  • Technology of Empire

    Open Access•Daqing Yang•Technology of Empire•2010

  • Brokers of Empire

    Esther Lovely•Asian Studies Review•2012

  • The tools of empire

    Daniel R Headrick, D Headrick•The tools of empire•1981

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae