The gold standard for life satisfaction

Confirmation and elaboration using an imaginary scale and qualitative interview

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12595286
AutoresD Mellor (0000-0001-5007-5906, autor de correspondencia), David T Mellor (0000-0002-3125-5888), Robert A Cummins (0000-0001-9014-7193), Claude Loquet
Año1999
Volumen2
Número4
Páginas263-278
Fecha de publicación1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1364-5579 • E-ISSN: 1464-5300
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/136455799294952
OpenAlexW2077961933
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8

It has now been established that normative samples drawn from Western populations report mean levels of life satisfaction that lie within 70-80 percent of the scale maximum. This study tests whether such consistency is an artifact of Likert scales, and also examines the cognitive processes people employ in making such judgements. Forty-two undergraduate psychology students were asked to describe an imagined worst and best life for themselves. They then rated their current life on a 100 point imaginary scale connecting their worst and best life, and completed a standard life satisfaction scale. The values obtained from the imaginary scale yielded a mean of 76.1 percent and correlated 0.79 with the standard scale. It was concluded that the normative standard for life satisfaction was not an artifact of scale construction. Life satisfaction judgement was found to be dominated by the life domain of intimacy and to confirm the types of comparisons predicted by multiple discrepancies theory

Developmental psychology · Judgement · Life satisfaction · Likert scale · Normative · Psychotherapist · Scale (ratio · The Imaginary · Aging and Gerontology Research · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology · Social Psychology