Fragments of a History of the Theory of Self-Consciousness from Kant to Kierkegaard
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12643149 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Manfred Frank (Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Tübingen, Bursagasse 1, D-72070, Germany, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2004 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 53-136 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2004-02-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Critical Horizons (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1163/1568516042653567 |
| OpenAlex | W1977385745 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
In the development of modern philosophy self-consciousness was not generally or unanimously given important consideration. This was because philosophers such as Descartes, Kant and Fichte thought it served as the highest principle from which we can ‘deduce’ all propositions that rightly claimed validity. However, the Romantics thought that the consideration of self-consciousness was of the highest importance even when any claim to foundationalism was abandoned. In this respect, Hölderlin and his circle, as well as Novalis and Schleiermacher, thought that self-consciousness, itself, was not a principle but must be ranked on a minor or dependent level, and presupposed the Absolute as a superior but inaccessible condition or ground. This reservation did not hinder them from recognising that the foundationalist Fichte was the first to have shown conclusively that from Descartes, via German Rationalism and British Empiricism, up to Kant, self-consciousness was misconceived of as the result of an act of reflection by which a second-order act bent back upon a first-order act that is identical to itself. This conception entailed circular entanglements and infinite regresses, and was too high a price to pay. Whereas Fichte thought pre-reflexive self-awareness was a philosophical principle, the Romantics and their vehement critic Kierkegaard, abandoned the idea of self-consciousness as a foundational starting point of philosophy. Instead, they founded self-consciousness on transcendent Being, a prior non-conceptual consciousness (‘feeling’) and reproached Fichte for having fallen back into the repudiated reflection model of self-consciousness
Consciousness · Epistemology · Foundationalism · Self-consciousness · Transcendental number · Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy · Philosophy and Historical Thought
Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness
Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness & Projective Geometry
Nonpositional Consciousness and the Form of Thinking
From Jena to Copenhagen
Identidad Y Antagonismo en El Pensamiento De Ernesto Laclau
On Pre-reflectivity of Self-consciousness in the Traditions of Advaita and Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta
A Critique of the Metaphysics of Ontological Poesis
Friedrich Hölderlin and the access to being as ground
The basis for the unity of experience in the thought of Friedrich Hölderlin
A Hermeneutic for and from Reading Kierkegaard's For Self-Examination
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,59 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |