Freedom, Equality and Fraternity in Kant’s Critique of Judgement
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12643306 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Agnes Heller (Philosophy, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 187-197 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-06-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Critical Horizons (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14409917.2018.1485235 |
| OpenAlex | W2810958130 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
At least during his critical period, all of Kant’s philosophical works have a secret political dimension. Among other things, following the analysis of Hannah Arendt, the Critique of Judgment – paragraph 40 in particular – became a main text of political philosophy. In looking at the Critique of Judgement from a political perspective, I shall refer not to paragraph 40 but to the Kantian discussion of pure aesthetic judgement. In my opinion, one can understand Kant’s remarks on aesthetic judgement, and especially transcendental anthropology, as meaning that Kant philosophically attributes the three political ideas of the French Revolution (liberty, fraternity and equality) to the whole human being as such, and not just to the intelligible man
Epistemology · Fraternity · Judgement · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Transcendental number · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |