Re-imagining nonpunitive approaches and rehabilitation in the courtroom
The case of drug courts in Chile
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12664021 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sebastián Galleguillo (0000-0001-5772-637X, University of Massachusetts Boston, autor de correspondencia), Sebastián Galleguillos (University of Massachusetts Boston, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Punishment & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14624745261416744 |
| OpenAlex | W7125769080 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
The combination of punishment and treatment in drug courts to rehabilitate defendants reflects the expansion of coercive penal care in court settings. In the U.S, drug courts remain deeply controversial: whereas some scholars and policymakers advocate for their expansion based on recidivism and cost-benefit evaluations, others raise concerns regarding the use of legal coercion and punitive measures in therapeutic settings. In 2004, Chile became the first Latin American country to implement drug courts. Unlike the U.S. drug court model, drug courts in Chile are not allowed to impose jail sanctions on defendants, offering a more restricted setting to examine how treatment and penal supervision are merged. Using semi-structured interviews (N = 34), I explore how courtroom actors and case managers understand the core elements of drug courts and their potential punitive nature. The findings show that the implementation of drug courts by team members—embracing recovery beyond zero-abstinence goals and focusing on the defendant's voluntariness to remain in the program— reflects a more balanced form of coercive penal care. Importantly, team members recognize the potential net-widening effects associated with this drug court model. I conclude by discussing the need to reformulate the role of defendants’ agency and punitive measures in problem-solving courts
Agency (philosophy · Coercion (linguistics · Drug court · Prison · Punishment (psychology · Punitive damages · Recidivism · Sanctions · Voluntariness · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Classification for Effective Rehabilitation
Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts
Reinforcing the abstinence ideal
Examining Perceived Coercion in Drug Treatment Courts
Positive Growth and Redemption in Prison
A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts in Chile
Recovery and desistance
Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism
Improving graduation rates in drug court
The Impact of Drug Courts
Shifting the practice of coercive penal care over time in a problem-solving court
Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject
Making the criminal addict
Shifting and targeted forms of penal governance
Theorizing the role of the ‘war on drugs’ in US punishment
Decision Making in a Hybrid Organization
Tough Love
Translating Justice and Therapy
Shifting Constellations of Actors and Their Influence on Policy Diffusion
The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation
Understanding Desistance from Crime
Southern Criminology
Doing Good with a Vengeance
The Thorny Intersection Between Adult Drug Treatment Courts and Medical Marijuana Criminal Immunity Laws
Governing Marginality
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |