Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A measure of justice

Citizen legal advocates, lay lawyering, and access to justice in Russia

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12664366
AutoresLauren A Mccarthy (0000-0001-9169-4375, University of Massachusetts Amherst, autor de correspondencia), Renata Mustafina (European University Institute)
Año2024
Volumen26
Número4
Páginas610-628
Fecha de publicación2024-09-02
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPunishment & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14624745241238155
OpenAlexW4402123813
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas42

What can access to justice look like in an authoritarian setting? In Russia, the law allows ordinary citizens who do not have a legal education to act as so-called citizen legal advocates (CLAs) in both criminal cases and cases on administrative offenses (non-criminal infractions). Drawing on qualitative fieldwork among CLAs in training sessions and in court, we show that lay people can enhance access to justice by impacting defendants’ experiences of the legal process itself despite the likely negative legal outcome. Through their multiple roles from legal advisors and coaches to guardians of prisoner welfare, we demonstrate the ways that lay people can contribute to access to justice at every stage of a defendant's journey through the system. Examining the case of lay lawyering in a repressive setting enables us to elicit and zoom in on practices—often obscured in the existing outcome-oriented scholarship—that are meaningful for access to justice in courts and prisons across the democratic/authoritarian divide

Criminology · Economic Justice · Measure (data warehouse · Political science · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Public Administration

  • The Evolution of Women’s Activism in Russia

    Regina Smyth, Ivan S Grigoriev et al.•Communist and Post-Communist…•2026

  • Oversight of the Legal System in an Authoritarian Regime

    Open Access•Lauren A Mccarthy•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Justice Beyond the Courts

    Open Access•Connor B S Strobel•Societies•2026

  • Environmental Litigation in China

    Open Access•Rachel E Stern•Environmental Litigation in China•2012

  • Rule by Law

    Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa•Rule by Law•2008

  • Rightful Resistance in Rural China

    Open Access•Kevin J O’brien, Kevin J O'Brien et al.•Rightful Resistance in Rural China•2006

  • The Rights Revolution

    Charles R Epp•Rights Revolution•1998

  • Trafficking Justice

    Lauren A Mccarthy•Trafficking justice•2015

  • Reclaiming Chinese Society

    You‐tien Hsing, You-Tien Hsing et al.•Reclaiming Chinese society•2009

  • Legal Dualism as a Framework for Analyzing the Role of Law under Authoritarianism

    Kathryn Hendley•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2022

  • Access to Justice and Legal Services Regulatory Reform

    Open Access•R L Sandefur, Emily Denne•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2022

  • Post-Soviet criminal justice

    Open Access•Peter H Solomon•Theoretical Criminology•2015

  • The “Right Paper”

    Open Access•Alyse Bertenthal•Law & Social Inquiry•2016

  • Russian Legal Culture

    Open Access•Marina Kurkchiyan•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • Privilege and Punishment

    Open Access•Andrew Mccall, Andrew J Mccall•Political Science Quarterly•2021

  • Access to What

    Open Access•R L Sandefur•Daedalus•2019

  • Nature versus Nurture

    Open Access•Kathryn Hendley•Law & Policy•2019

  • Faking performance together

    Ella Paneyakh•Post-Soviet Affairs•2014

  • Disguised Collective Action in China

    Open Access•Diana Fu•Comparative Political Studies•2017

  • Closing Open Government

    Open Access•Jieun Kim, Rachel E Stern et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice

    Open Access•Erica Michelson, Ethan Michelson•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Usages choisis du droit

    Éric Agrikoliansky•Sociétés contemporaines•2003

  • Too Much of a Good Thing? Assessing Access to Civil Justice in Russia

    Open Access•Kathryn Hendley•Slavic Review•2013

  • On Shared Suffering

    Open Access•Michele Statz•Law & Society Review•2021

  • Relieving the Tension

    Open Access•Jamie Longazel•Law & Society Review•2018

  • Turning on the lights? Publicity and defensive legal mobilization in protest-related trials in Russia

    Open Access•Renata Mustafina•Law & Society Review•2022

  • Mobilizing the Law in China

    Open Access•Mary E Gallagher•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Une pédagogie du droit sous contrainte. Les syndicalistes et les inspecteurs du travail dans l'activité de consultation juridique

    Laurent Willemez•Politix•2017

  • "Islamico-civil "rights talk

    Open Access•Arzoo Osanloo•American Ethnologist•2006

  • Do You See What I See? Examining a Collaborative Ethnography

    Open Access•Reuben A Buford May, Mary Pattillo-Mccoy et al.•Qualitative Inquiry•2000

  • Who Can We Tell Survivors to Call?' The Institutionalization of Criminal-Legal Interventions in a Domestic Violence Organization

    Open Access•Benjamin R Wei•Social Problems•2020

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae