Deradicalisation, disengagement, rehabilitation and reintegration of violent extremists in conflict-affected contexts
A systematic literature review
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12683025 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lina Grip (0000-0001-8976-8718, Department of Economic History and International Relations, Stockholm University and Research and Evaluation Unit, Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Stockholm, Sweden, autor de correspondencia), Jenniina Kotajoki (0000-0002-9952-4626, Research and Evaluation Unit, Swedish Prison and Probation Service, Stockholm, Sweden) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 19 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 371-402 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Conflict Security and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1467-8802 • E-ISSN: 1478-1174 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14678802.2019.1626577 |
| OpenAlex | W2962904812 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
This article identifies, assesses and synthesises existing literature on deradicalisation, disengagement, rehabilitation and reintegration (DDRR) in conflict-affected states through a systematic literature review. While existing research has methodological shortcomings and determining the outcomes of DDRR programmes is challenging, 12 common themes surfaced in the synthesis. According to the studies selected, varying experiences of the individuals in violent extremist organisations, including form of engagement, role in the organisation and experiences of insecurity and disillusion, may affect DDRR processes. Capacity and resource constrains may pose challenges to DDRR programming in conflict-affected contexts, but engaging former extremists, their families and communities at large mitigates the issues characteristic for conflict-affected contexts and contributes to wider peace-building objectives
Affect (linguistics · Criminology · Disengagement theory · Political science · Public relations · Resource (disambiguation · Sociology · Computer Science · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Rehabilitation
Desistance, Disengagement, and Deradicalization
The governance of Islamic extremism in the Middle East
Innovative Empowerment Model in Harmonization and Deradicalization of Islamic Boarding School
Community perspectives of former terrorist combatants, militants and reintegration programmes in Nigeria
Community perspectives of terrorism and the Nigerian government’s counterterrorism strategies
(De)Weaponizing Climate-Induced Recruitment
La place des croyances dans les processus de sortie de l’extrémisme violent
A Comparative Analysis of Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Indonesian Deradicalization Program, Approaches and Best Practices
Prison reform in conflict-affected contexts
Rethinking reintegration in Nigeria
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences
A typology of reviews
Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism
Research on Terrorism, 2007–2016
Countering Violent Extremism
Escaping the LRA
What a difference two years make
Systematic Reviews in Political Science
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective
High Risk or Low Risk
Youths in Violent Extremist Discourse
Religiosity and Rebellion in Nigeria
Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism
Doing Peace”
A Guide to Interviewing Terrorists and Violent Extremists
Integration versus Segregation
Reality Versus Perception
Modern post-conflict security sector reform in Africa
From “Rebel” to “Returnee”
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law
From Terrorists to Peacekeepers
Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists
Explaining Recidivism of Ex-combatants in Colombia
Demobilization and Reintegration
Why They Leave
When Protection Collapses
Victimisation and Attitudes Towards Former Political Prisoners in Northern Ireland
Resistance, Transition and Exclusion
Organized violence, 1989-2016
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |