Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Feminist And Postfeminist Readings Of Romantic Narratives

Heterosexual romantic experiences versus Sex and the City

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12690479
AutoresRiva Tukachinsky (autor de correspondencia), Riva H Tukachinsky
Año2008
Volumen8
Número2
Páginas181-196
Fecha de publicación2008-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFeminist Media Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1468-0777 • E-ISSN: 1471-5902
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14680770801980562
OpenAlexW1516866636
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas23

This paper examines the reception and interpretation of romantic narratives among fifteen Israeli heterosexual women viewers of the TV series Sex and the City. Based upon the dialogue carried out by the participants in two discussion groups and individual interviews, I map the different strategies employed by the viewers in interpreting the show, as situated within their worldviews concerning issues such as romance and romantic relationships, power relations, and social gender roles. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Dr. Oren Meyers of the University of Haifa for his advice during every stage of the research; Dr. Amir Hetsroni of Yezreel Valley College for his help in arranging the discussion groups; and Mr. Oren Livio of the University of Pennsylvania for his helpful comments and assistance in writing the English version of the manuscript. Notes 1. According to the Israeli Audience Research Board, the series averaged a rating of 21.5 percent. Over six seasons, Citation Sex and the City was consistently rated among the twenty most watched shows in Israel, an impressive figure given its late prime time placement and the fact that the most popular shows in Israel are usually locally produced. In the US, each episode reached 4,914,000 households (an average rating of 3.5 percent). It occupied the top spot in the cable stations ratings chart until the final episode was aired in 2004. Since then, it has been shown on many stations across the country on a syndication basis. 2. All names mentioned in this paper were changed in order to insure participants' anonymity. For convenience, I have chosen Israeli names that are also familiar to the English speaking reader. 3. For convenience, I will heretofore refer to the participants who called themselves romantic as “romantic,” and to those who said they were not romantic as “unromantic.” 4. Charlotte was seen as different from the other protagonists I will elaborate on her character later on

Art · Literature · Media studies · Narrative · Power (physics · Psychoanalysis · Romance · Sociology · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · History · Media Studies and Communication · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology

  • Can an intelligent personal assistant (IPA) be your friend? Para-friendship development mechanism between IPAs and their users

    Open Access•Chung‐wha Ki, Chung-Wha Ki et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • The Influence of Exemplar Versus Prototype-Based Media Primes on Racial/Ethnic Evaluations

    Open Access•Dana Mastro, Riva Tukachinsky•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Feminism, Post-feminism, and Young Women’s Reactions to Lena Dunham’s Girls

    Open Access•Rose Weitz•Gender Issues•2015

  • What’s Love Got to Do with It? A Qualitative Grounded Theory Content Analysis of Romance Narratives in the PG Era of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) Programming

    Open Access•Betty Jo Barrett, Dana S Levin•Sexuality & Culture•2013

  • Through whose looking glass? Interrogating representations of hybridity through the Turkish Detective

    Cagri Yalkin, Kubra Uygur•Consumption Markets & Culture•2025

  • Gender and Family in Television’s Golden Age and Beyond

    Open Access•Andrea Press, Andrea L Press•The Annals of the American…•2009

  • Consuming the Romantic Utopia

    Eva Illouz•Consuming the Romantic Utopia•1997

  • Talk of Love

    Ann Swidler•Talk of Love•2001

  • Communication Yearbook 31

    Christina S Beck, Christina Beck•Communication Yearbook 31•2009

  • Close Relationships

    Clyde Hendrick, Susan Hendrick et al.•Close relationships•2000

  • The Transformation of Intimacy

    Anthony Giddens•The transformation of intimacy•1992

  • What is this thing called love? Defining the love that supports marriage and family

    Open Access•Patricia Noller•Personal Relationships•1996

  • Media Audiences as Interpretive Communities

    Thomas Rlindlof•Annals of the International…•1988

  • Sex and the Single Girl” in Postfeminism

    Open Access•L S Kim•Television & New Media•2001

  • Cultivation Analysis

    George Gerbner•Mass Communication & Society•1998

  • Sex and the City and Consumer Culture

    Jane Arthurs•Feminist Media Studies•2003

  • Postfeminist Television Criticism

    Amanda D Lotz•Feminist Media Studies•2001

  • IV. Looking for Love in Intimate Heterosexual Relationships

    Open Access•Angie Burns•Feminism & Psychology•2000

  • Romance novel readers

    Lynda L Crane•Women s Studies•1994

  • An Exploration of Women's Leisure within Heterosexual Romantic Relationships

    Kristi L Herridge, Susan Shaw et al.•Journal of Leisure Research•2003

  • The Mythology of Modern Love

    Open Access•C Lee Harrington, Denise D Bielby•The Journal of Popular Culture•1991

  • Women, power and resistance

    Mary Maynard•Women s History Review•1997

  • Development of the `Romantic Beliefs Scale' and Examination of the Effects of Gender and Gender-Role Orientation

    Open Access•Sprecher, Susan Sprecher et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1989

  • The Social Construction of Love

    Open Access•Anne E Beall, Anne Beall et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1995

  • The End of Romance

    Open Access•Jerome Dowd, James J Dowd et al.•Sociological Perspectives•2000

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año0,35
Intervalo de citas2009 - 2025 (17)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae