The Age of Austerity

Contesting the Ethical Basis and Financial Sustainability of Welfare Reform in Europe

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12736769
AutoresDaniel Edmiston (0000-0001-8715-654X, University of Leeds, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen22
Número2
Páginas118-131
Fecha de publicación2014-04-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Contemporary European Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1478-2790 • E-ISSN: 1478-2804
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14782804.2014.910179
OpenAlexW1986995944
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas29

This paper examines the policy of austerity in three European welfare regimes with differing levels of social spending and fiscal balance: Italy; Sweden; and the UK. In spite of significant material differences between the three countries, the paper begins by illustrating that there is ultimately convergence in their responses to the economic crisis. These welfare regimes have justified the terms of austerity by suggesting that economic and welfare reforms address questions of ‘need’, ‘fairness’ and ‘sustainability’. Contrary to dominant political and policy rationale, the paper demonstrates that austerity measures in each country fail to meet policy objectives given their own conceptions of social and distributive justice. The three welfare regimes lack cogent strategies to safeguard their financial sustainability and this results in a neo-liberal paradigm that compromises the ethical and internal coherence of austerity

Austerity · Economic policy · Economics · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Sustainability · Welfare · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies