Fuel for the Fire

Biofuels and the Problem of Translation at the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12754136
AutoresDeborah Scott (0000-0002-5962-2002, autor de correspondencia), Sarah Hitchner (0000-0003-0407-6232, University of Georgia), Edward M Maclin (0000-0002-8664-5365), Juan Luis Dammert B
Año2014
Volumen14
Número3
Páginas84-101
Fecha de publicación2014-07-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGlobal Environmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1526-3800 • E-ISSN: 1536-0091
EditorialThe MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/glep_a_00240
OpenAlexW2160728022
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8
Referencias citadas19

At the 2010 negotiations of the Conference of the Parties (COP10) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) for a decision on biofuels and bio-diversity, biofuels were portrayed as holding many different, conflicting characteristics. Using Callon's (1986) concept of translation, we find that the COP10 biofuel negotiations failed to advance beyond the first moment of translation, problematization, when actors are defined in relation to each other. We trace attempts by various actors to fix the identity of biofuels throughout the negotiations, using strategies such as rendering political issues “technical,” relying on formal text to stabilize contested identities, and restricting the sources of knowledge relied upon. We suggest that the CBD parties experiment with new strategies, taking advantage of the COP's legal flexibility and the CBD's institutional history of engaging with the political nature of scientific knowledge

Biodiversity · Biofuel · Biology · Conference of the parties · Convention · Convention on Biological Diversity · Diversity (politics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Problematization · Sociology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Law · Ecology