Prosecution and Punishment of Corporate Criminality
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12795124 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mihailis Diamantis (0000-0002-3398-7281, University of Iowa, autor de correspondencia), William S Laufer (University of Pennsylvania) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 453-472 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-08-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Annual Review of Law and Social Science (BOOK_SERIES) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1550-3585 • E-ISSN: 1550-3631 |
| Editorial | Annual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031212 |
| OpenAlex | W3121656760 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 55 |
This article offers an overview of and commentary on the US approach to corporate prosecution and punishment. Though the United States purports to have a vigorous system of corporate criminal law enforcement, one could reasonably ask whether that system actually takes corporate crime seriously. Corporate prosecutions, convictions, and punishment continue to be rare events. Sanctions leveraged against corporations range from those whose effectiveness remains unproved, to those that are provably ineffective, to those that are conceptually and practically incoherent. One could also reasonably ask to what extent the United States even has a corporate criminal law to enforce. The recent history of corporate criminal law enforcement reflects a discernable shift in discretion from judges to prosecutors. This period is marked by the importance of extralegal prosecutorial guidelines, the absence of controlling case law, large gaps in statutory law, and long-called-for law reforms. One result is a systematic shift from reliance on public enforcement to private self-regulation. Not only are the resulting costs to the private sector substantial and growing, but the problems with relying on corporations to police themselves are plain to see. Amid these challenges, the thirst for private-sector responsibility and accountability should motivate continued debate over the prosecution and punishment of corporations
Accountability · Business · Corporate crime · Corporate governance · Corporate law · Criminal law · Discretion · Economics · Enforcement · Law and economics · Law enforcement · Political science · Punishment (psychology · Sanctions · Statutory law · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Too Big to Jail
Collective and Corporate Responsibility
Responsive Regulation
Kant
The Open Corporation
"No Soul to Damn
Decentring Regulation
Responsibility Incorporated
Enforced Self-Regulation
The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations
Theory of the firm
What Works
The Seriousness of Crime Revisited
Reimagining Sutherland 80 years after white‐collar crime
Really Responsive Regulation
Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement
Organizational Crime
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |