Consensus decision-making in CCAMLR
Achilles’ heel or fundamental to its success
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12823313 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lynda Goldsworthy (0000-0003-1426-4915, Centre for Marine Socioecology, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 411-437 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-04-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1567-9764 • E-ISSN: 1573-1553 |
| Editorial | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10784-021-09561-4 |
| PMID | 35431700 |
| OpenAlex | W4224213986 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
The Commission for the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources is the body responsible for the conservation and management of most species in the Southern Ocean. The Convention mandates that decisions be made by consensus agreement of its Members. This approach has been largely successful in delivering strong management decisions across both complex issues and widely ranging national interests. However, recent failures to progress the implementation of a network of marine protected areas or to agree any concrete response actions to climate impacts raise concerns about its effectiveness. This paper reviews the level of uptake of Member-driven proposals and then examines examples of proposals that were not resolved within the usual three years to analyse the processes utilised by Members to find resolution. It concludes that CCAMLR has been successful in reaching agreements when focusing on fisheries management but less so on issues within its broader conservation mandate, such as area protection for biodiversity purposes or non-fishery management focused scientific study, or for issues that are perceiv ed to extend the competency of the Convention. It notes that CCAMLR lacks operational mechanisms to facilitate agreement in the absence of compromise text or when one or two Members cannot accept a proposal
Biodiversity · Biology · Business · Commission · Compromise · Convention · Convention on Biological Diversity · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Mandate · Marine conservation · Marine protected area · Political science · Public relations · Uncertainty · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Coastal and Marine Management · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Ecology
Establishing marine protected areas in the southern ocean, lessons for the BBNJ agreement
Fit-for-purpose ocean management in times of change – marine conservation and management examples from the Polar Regions
Stakeholder perceptions of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources Marine Protected Area planning process
What is needed to implement a sustainable expansion of the Antarctic krill fishery in the Southern Ocean
The future of the South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands marine protected area in a changing environment
Communicating Antarctica in a Changing Climate – Recommendations Following a National Survey
Spatial protection tools as indicators of the 'health' of the Antarctic Treaty system
Benefits and risks of incremental protected area planning in the Southern Ocean
One century of US policy toward Antarctica
Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
The rise of China and conservation of marine living resources in the polar regions
The Ross Sea, Antarctica
Southern Ocean fishery management - Is CCAMLR addressing the challenges posed by a changing climate
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |