Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Moral autonomy in Australian legislation and military doctrine

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12866771
AutoresRichard Adams (0000-0002-3650-5911, Australian Defence College, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen6
Número3
Páginas135-154
Fecha de publicación2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEthics & Global Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1654-6369 • E-ISSN: 1654-4951
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3402/egp.v6i3.20019
OpenAlexW2122201049
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas13

Australian legislation and military doctrine stipulate that soldiers ‘subjugate their will’ to government, and fight in any war the government declares. Neither legislation nor doctrine enables the conscience of soldiers. Together, provisions of legislation and doctrine seem to take soldiers for granted. And, rather than strengthening the military instrument, the convention of legislation and doctrine seems to weaken the democratic foundations upon which the military may be shaped as a force for justice. Denied liberty of their conscience, soldiers are denied the foundational right of democratic citizenship and construed as utensils of the State. This article critiques the idea of moral agency in Australian legislation and military doctrine and is concerned with the obligation of the State to safeguard the moral integrity of individual soldiers, so soldiers might serve with a fully formed moral assurance to advance justice in the world. Beyond its explicit focus on the convention of Australian thought, this article raises questions of far-reaching relevance. The provisos of Australian legislation and doctrine are an analogue of western thinking. Thus, this discussion challenges many assumptions concerning military duty and effectiveness. Discussion will additionally provoke some reassessment of the expectations democratic societies hold of their soldiers

Autonomy · Conscience · Democracy · Doctrine · Duty · Legislation · Military doctrine · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Military History and Strategy · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn et al.•Physics Today•1963

  • American society

    Robin M Williams•American society•1970

  • Crimes Against Humanity

    Geoffrey Robertson•Crimes Against Humanity•2013

  • Epictetus on Cynicism

    Malcolm Schofield•The Philosophy of Epictetus•2007

  • The Hellenistic Philosophers

    Open Access•A A Long, David Sedley et al.•Hellenistic Philosophers•1987

  • Conscience, Law and the State

    Open Access•Hugh Smith•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1989

  • Making War on Terrorists—Reflections on Harming the Innocent

    Open Access•Thomas Pogge•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007

  • Security Ethics and the Modern Military

    Open Access•Mira Sucharov•Armed Forces & Society•2005

  • John Rawls, Justice as Fairness

    Open Access•James M Buchanan•Public Choice•2002

  • An uninformed debate on military culture

    Open Access•Don M Snider•Orbis•1999

  • The Relation of Stoic Intermediates to the Summum Bonum , with Reference to Change in the Stoa

    Open Access•I G Kidd•The Classical Quarterly•1955

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae