Moral autonomy in Australian legislation and military doctrine
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12866771 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard Adams (0000-0002-3650-5911, Australian Defence College, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 6 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 135-154 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics & Global Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1654-6369 • E-ISSN: 1654-4951 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3402/egp.v6i3.20019 |
| OpenAlex | W2122201049 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 13 |
Australian legislation and military doctrine stipulate that soldiers ‘subjugate their will’ to government, and fight in any war the government declares. Neither legislation nor doctrine enables the conscience of soldiers. Together, provisions of legislation and doctrine seem to take soldiers for granted. And, rather than strengthening the military instrument, the convention of legislation and doctrine seems to weaken the democratic foundations upon which the military may be shaped as a force for justice. Denied liberty of their conscience, soldiers are denied the foundational right of democratic citizenship and construed as utensils of the State. This article critiques the idea of moral agency in Australian legislation and military doctrine and is concerned with the obligation of the State to safeguard the moral integrity of individual soldiers, so soldiers might serve with a fully formed moral assurance to advance justice in the world. Beyond its explicit focus on the convention of Australian thought, this article raises questions of far-reaching relevance. The provisos of Australian legislation and doctrine are an analogue of western thinking. Thus, this discussion challenges many assumptions concerning military duty and effectiveness. Discussion will additionally provoke some reassessment of the expectations democratic societies hold of their soldiers
Autonomy · Conscience · Democracy · Doctrine · Duty · Legislation · Military doctrine · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Military History and Strategy · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
American society
Crimes Against Humanity
Epictetus on Cynicism
The Hellenistic Philosophers
Conscience, Law and the State
Making War on Terrorists—Reflections on Harming the Innocent
Security Ethics and the Modern Military
John Rawls, Justice as Fairness
An uninformed debate on military culture
The Relation of Stoic Intermediates to the Summum Bonum , with Reference to Change in the Stoa
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |