Mis-implementation of evidence-based behavioural health practices in primary care

Lessons from randomised trials in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12889192
AutoresAlex R Dopp (0000-0002-2522-6546, RAND Corporation, autor de correspondencia), Grace Hindmarch (University of California, San Francisco), Karen Chan Osilla (0000-0002-6222-5833, Boston University), Lisa S Meredith (0000-0003-4523-7098, Boston University), Jennifer K Manuel (0000-0001-7457-3408, Boston University), Kirsten Becker (University of Washington), Lina Tarhuni (Boston University), Michael Schoenbaum (0000-0002-7793-6734, University of Washington), Miriam Komaromy (0000-0002-3159-381X, RAND Corporation), Andrea Cassells (0000-0001-5579-0298, University of California, San Francisco), Katherine E Watkins (0009-0005-7573-5292, Clinical Directors Network)
Año2024
Volumen20
Número1
Páginas1-21
Fecha de publicación2024-01-08
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEvidence & Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1744-2648 • E-ISSN: 1744-2656
EditorialPolicy Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/17442648y2023d000000016
PMID38911233
OpenAlexW4390661032
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas9

Multi-level determinants contributed to EBP mis-implementation in FQHCs, limiting the ability of these health systems to benefit from knowledge exchange. To minimize mis-implementation, knowledge exchange strategies should be designed around common, core barriers but also flexible enough to address a variety of site-specific contextual factors and should be tailored to relevant audiences such as providers, patients, and/or leadership

Family medicine · Health care · Political science · Primary care · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology · Public Health Policies and Education · Gerontology