Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Sacred Maize against a Legal Maze

The Diversity of Resistance to Guatemala’s ‘Monsanto Law’

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12901455
AutoresLiza Grandia (University of California, Davis, autor de correspondencia)
Año2017
Volumen11
Número1
Páginas56-85
Fecha de publicación2017-07-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1749-4907 • E-ISSN: 1749-4915
EditorialEquinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1558/jsrnc.30666
OpenAlexW2729200609
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10

I chronicle here how a small country deled one of the world’s largest corporations and, in the process, reinvigorated civic hopes for a more democratic future. In the summer of 2014, massive mobilizations across Guatemala forced its legislature to repeal a plant varieties protection act, dubbed the ‘Monsanto Law’ that would otherwise have legalized genetically modiled (GM) crops in one of the few countries worldwide that prohibits them. Harnessing Raymond Williams’s distinction between residual/emergent and incorporated/unincorporated counter-hegemonies, I examine how diverse classes and interest groups articulated their opposition to the law through expressions of ‘moral economy’ across social media and news platforms. With respect to Guatemala’s indigenous majority, I explain how and why Maya leaders uncompromisingly regard GM corn as blasphemy through my prior cultural and historical research on the centrality of maize for indigenous economic survival, community cohesion, autonomy, and spiritual identity

Autonomy · Blasphemy · Democracy · Indigenous · Legislature · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Repeal · Sociology · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law

  • The Democracy Development Machine

    Open Access•Nicholas Copeland•Democracy Development Machine•2019

  • ‘Biotechnologizing’ or ‘democratizing’

    Open Access•Carrie Seay Fleming•Canadian Food Studies / La Revue…•2022

  • Vivir, educar y luchar en el campo. Acciones y coaliciones de pobladores rurales

    Open Access•Marí­a Amalia Miano, Joaquí­n Rotman et al.•Revista Temas Sociológicos•2020

  • Contested Imaginaries of Biotechnology Governance in Guatemala

    Carrie Seay‐fleming, Carrie Seay-Fleming•The Professional Geographer•2023

  • Feed the futureland

    Open Access•Carrie Seay‐fleming•Agriculture and Human Values•2023

  • Meeting peasants where they are

    Nicholas Copeland•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2018

  • Politicizing water

    Open Access•Nicholas Copeland•Geoforum•2023

  • A novel human-based nature-conservation paradigm in Guatemala paves the way for overcoming the metabolic rift

    Open Access•José Pablo Prado Córdova•Capital & Class•2021

  • Seed sovereignty as decommodification

    Carol Hernández Rodríguez•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2023

  • Linking the defence of territory to food sovereignty

    Open Access•Nicholas Copeland•Journal of Agrarian Change•2019

Obras citantes distintas10
Citas por año1,25
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2023 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 10
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae