To Register or Not—the Relevance of the Social Work Codes of Practice for the Social Work Lecturer
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12901944 |
|---|---|
| Autores | James Reid (0000-0001-5977-0083, TES Global (United Kingdom), autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2007 |
| Volumen | 1 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 336-341 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2007-10-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496530701603012 |
| OpenAlex | W2006563713 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 4 |
Higher education institutions in the United Kingdom are increasingly demanding that social work lecturers are ‘registered’ with the UK regulatory body, the General Social Care Council (GSCC) as a requirement of appointment for the post of social work lecturer. There are many compelling reasons for such an expectation but this paper argues that such action should not be undertaken uncritically. Using Colnerud's five categories of norms a number of tensions for the lecturer are explored that indicate that the current GSCC codes of practice do not fully recognize the role of the social work lecturer
Action (physics · Code of practice · Engineering ethics · Linguistics · Political science · Public relations · Register (sociolinguistics · Relevance (law · Social care · Sociology · Work (physics · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Research in Social Sciences · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |