Research Ethics Review
Social Care and Social Science Research and the Mental Capacity Act 2005
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12902249 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jonathan Parker (0000-0002-3817-4781, Bournemouth University, autor de correspondencia), Bridget Penhale (0000-0002-8487-0606), David Stanley (0000-0001-7767-5442, Northumbria University) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 5 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 380-400 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496535.2011.594448 |
| OpenAlex | W1981462086 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 30 |
This paper considers concerns that social care research may be stifled by health-focused ethical scrutiny under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the requirement for an ‘appropriate body’ to determine ethical approval for research involving people who are deemed to lack capacity under the Act to make decisions concerning their participation and consent in research. The current study comprised an online survey of current practice in university research ethics committees (URECs), and explored through semi-structured interviews the views of social researchers engaged in or exploring work concerning people who may, under the Act, lack the capacity to make decisions to consent to participate in a research programme. The paper concludes that there was a lack of overt knowledge of and reference to the implications of the Act for research and some concerns that a restrictive focus on health-related scrutiny might prevent social care research from taking place. There was also a degree of creativity shown by social care researchers in responding to changing demands and a wish to assist people in making decisions to participate where possible
Alternative medicine · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Public relations · Research ethics · Scrutiny · Sociology · Work (physics · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology · Social Work
The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research
Qualitative Data Analysis in Health Psychology
Mental Health and Mental Capacity Law
Realising the safeguarding potential of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
What Counts as Research? The Implications for Research Governance in Social Care
The Epistemological Bias of Ethics Review
I live for today’
Research governance framework for health and social care
Constructing and Reconstructing ‘Best Interests’
Research Ethics Review and the Sociological Research Relationship
Academic psychologists' perspectives on the human research ethics review process
A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research
Ethics and Governance in Social Work Research in the UK
Critical Commentary
The Art and Politics of Covert Research
Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice
Written work
Ethics Creep
Ethical and Political Issues in Contemporary Research Relationships
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |