China's Partnership Diplomacy

International Alignment Based on Interests or Ideology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12907335
AutoresGeorg Strüver (Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, autor de correspondencia)
Año2016
Páginaspow015-pow015
Fecha de publicación2016-11-16
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/cjip/pow015
OpenAlexW2582939839
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas35

While it was impossible during much of the Cold War period to think about international cooperation absent the term 'alliances', over the past two decades strategic partnerships have occupied a central position in many states' diplomatic toolkit. This article sheds light on such international alignment decisions by examining the case of China's partnership diplomacy during the period 1990 to 2015. Theoretically, the analysis draws on scholarly insights into alliance formation and international cooperation to formulate two broad assumptions about partner choice which are based on interest-driven and ideology-based rationales of alignment. Binary regression estimations highlight the importance of economic interests in explaining partnership onset. In contrast to common arguments about alliance formation, partnerships seem unlikely to be driven by shared domestic ideologies. In fact, bilateral partnerships help to bridge ideological gaps and to enable, at least in the case of China, the respective partners' pursuit of economic gains and diplomatic preferences. With regard to the presumed payoffs of partnerships, the analysis further suggests that partnerships mean more to bilateral relations than purely nominal titles. Rather, they have measurable impact on partners' economic relations as well as on convergence regarding their views on the international order. China's growing spectrum of partnerships, therefore, expands the country's potential to exert impact on international political outcomes

Alliance · China · Convergence (economics · Diplomacy · Economic growth · Economics · General partnership · Ideology · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Sociology · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law