RCEP from the middle powers’ Perspective”
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12917821 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Fukunari Kimura (0000-0002-9834-3153, Keio University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 162-170 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-05-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | China Economic Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1753-8963 • E-ISSN: 1753-8971 |
| Editorial | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17538963.2021.1933059 |
| OpenAlex | W3172720648 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
East Asian countries signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) in November 2020. This paper demonstrates the importance of ASEAN centrality in East Asian economic integration and makes a preliminary assessment of the agreement in terms of the four expected roles: liberalization, rulemaking, reducing policy risks, and forming a pro-trade middle power coalition. The comparison with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) reveals the strengths and weaknesses of RCEP. The paper emphasizes the importance of dynamic aspects of mega-FTAs after being in effect and claims that RCEP must be further developed as an evolving agreement
Business · Free trade · Free trade agreement · General partnership · International trade · Liberalization · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Rulemaking · Strengths and weaknesses · Computer Science · Global Political and Economic Relations · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |