Critical terrorism studies

An activist scholar perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12918604
AutoresEric Herring (0000-0002-1343-1817, University of Bristol, autor de correspondencia)
Año2008
Volumen1
Número2
Páginas197-211
Fecha de publicación2008-07-11
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCritical Studies on Terrorism (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1753-9161 • E-ISSN: 1753-9153
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17539150802187507
OpenAlexW2091728457
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas16
Referencias citadas35

There is a pressing need for critical terrorism studies. Mainstream terrorism studies obscures the class function of terrorism, values the worthy victims of official enemies over the unworthy victims of official allies, keeps Northern state terrorism off the agenda and deploys the concept of terrorism in a way that deleitimises opposition to the power of the global North while legitimising the global North’s own political violence. Critical terrorism studies should break with mainstream terrorism studies on all of these fronts. It should address how terrorism has evolved as an instrument of the power and privilege of the global North. It should treat the victims of terrorism equally on the basis of their common humanity, which means the terrorism of the global North or global South should not be treated as the only terrorism that matters. And it should use the label terrorism to hold up a mirror to those who accuse others of terrorist acts but who engage in, sponsor or are complicit in such acts themselves. Finally, it should situate its challenge to terrorism within a challenge to the use of political violence in general

Criminology · Mainstream · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Terrorism · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence