Integration after totalitarianism

Arendt and Habermas on the postwar imperatives of memory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12923239
AutoresPeter J Verovšek (0000-0001-8946-2014, University of Sheffield, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen16
Número1
Páginas2-24
Fecha de publicación2018-09-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1755088218796535
OpenAlexW2891538750
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8
Referencias citadas55

Collective memories of totalitarianism and the industrialized slaughter of the Holocaust have exerted a profound influence on postwar European politics and philosophy. Two of the most prominent political theorists and public intellectuals to take up the legacy of total war are Hannah Arendt and Jürgen Habermas. However, their prescriptions seem to pull in opposite directions. While Arendt draws on remembrance to recover politics on a smaller scale by advocating for the empowerment of local councils, Habermas draws on the past to justify his search for postnational forms of political community that can overcome the bloody legacy of nationalism. My argument brings these two perspectives together by examining their mutual support for European integration as a way of preserving the lessons of totalitarianism. I argue that both Arendt and Habermas reject the technocratic tendencies of the European Union while maintaining hope that it can develop a truly postnational form of politics

Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Epistemology · European union · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Technocracy · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty