Lessons for Nature‐Based Carbon Removal
Learning From the Politics of Environmental Conservation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12929317 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Scott Freeman (0000-0002-6622-6577, American University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 16 |
| Número | 5 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.70024 |
| OpenAlex | W7083631838 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 48 |
Climate models and policy makers suggest that in order to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement, large‐scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches is a critical complement to aggressive decarbonization of the global economy. Recent proposed guidance from the UNFCCC suggests that nature‐based—rather than engineered—approaches to carbon removal are safer and proven. Such guidance presumes that tree‐planting and coastal restoration, for example, do not have negative social impacts. The history of similar interventions in the conservation field suggests several substantial social and justice considerations. Critical conservation scholarship has highlighted the potential negative social consequences of interventions such as protected areas and widescale tree‐planting. Mainstream conservation has, in some cases, ignored the social relations that are present in areas of environmental interventions. This has created a variety of issues, including displacement, economic marginalization, and the erasure of indigenous peoples and local communities. Nature‐based CDR shares and draws on a number of assumptions and policies of environmental conservation, specifically ignoring the social relations connecting people and environments. The carbon removal field can learn from critical conservation scholarship to offer a more effective and just model of carbon removal. This article is categorized under: The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies Policy and Governance > International Policy Framework
Convention on Biological Diversity · Corporate governance · Environmental governance · Environmental studies · Indigenous · Mainstream · Politics · Psychological intervention · Scholarship · Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing · Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus · Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Conservation Is Our Government Now
Rich Forests, Poor People
An Anthropological Perspective on Some Unexpected Consequences of Protected Areas
The global tree restoration potential
Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons
A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas
Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes
Why we must question the militarisation of conservation
Community managed forests and forest protected areas
Supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance
Conservation, green/blue grabbing and accumulation by dispossession in Tanzania
Political ecology of tiger conservation in India
Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions
Slippery Violence in the Redd+ Forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
Disputed Land Rights and Conservation-led Displacement
A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation
Framing “nature‐based” solutions to climate change
Natural carbon removal as technology
Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal
Vertebrate biodiversity on indigenous-managed lands in Australia, Brazil, and Canada equals that in protected areas
Rethinking Net-Zero systems, spaces, and societies
Coercing conservation
Carbon colonialism and the new land grab
Rhino poaching and the “slow violence” of conservation-related resettlement in Mozambique’s Limpopo National Park
Virtual nature, violent accumulation
From Racialized Neocolonial Global Conservation to an Inclusive and Regenerative Conservation
The Trouble with Wilderness
Engaging Simplifications
Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation
Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation
Conservation Law Enforcement
Ecologies of the colonial present
Challenging Neo-Malthusian Deforestation Analyses in West Africa's Dynamic Forest Landscapes
Green Grabbing
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |