The Little Ice Age

The History and Future of a Traveling Concept

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12929481
AutoresDominik Collet (0000-0001-8970-970X, University of Oslo, autor de correspondencia), White (0000-0002-1046-3944, University of Helsinki), Sina Bremer (0000-0002-4505-9386, University of Bergen), Brita Brenna (0000-0001-7725-8032, University of South-Eastern Norway), Håkon Glørstad (University of Oslo), Ingar MØrkestØl Gundersen (University of Oslo), Heli Huhtamaa (0000-0001-5829-5575, University of Bern), Kirstin Krüger (0000-0002-0636-9488, Norwegian Meteorological Institute), Hans W Linderholm (0000-0002-1522-8919, University of Gothenburg), Fredrik Charpentier Ljungqvist (0000-0003-0220-3947, Stockholm University), A E J Ogilvie (0000-0001-9711-7878, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research), Helene Løvstrand Svarva (0000-0001-8501-4767, Vitensenteret i Trondheim), Bergsveinn Þórsson (0000-0002-8080-4548, Reykjavík University)
Año2025
Volumen16
Número5
Fecha de publicación2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/wcc.70023
OpenAlexW4414739161
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas187

First coined in the 1930s, with reference to glaciation in North America, the concept of the “Little Ice Age” has undergone continuous revisions. It has traveled academically from glaciology to climatology, archeology, history, and, most recently, climate communication. Over time, it has grown into one of the most discussed topics in the field of climate history and attracts both considerable scholarly interest and public attention. The term “Little Ice Age” has been criticized for oversimplifying climatic change, focusing too much on temperature, and excluding possible effects on humans. Yet it remains a powerful “boundary object” in interdisciplinary cooperation, science communication, and the “environing” of history. In this sense, it serves similar functions as other concepts in the field of human–environment interactions, such as “global warming” or “climate resilience.” This article investigates the contested history and the potential uses of the “Little Ice Age” concept. It explores how the concept encourages interdisciplinary consilience, global perspectives, and public debate. In summary, these aspects are connected and contrasted to the use of similar concepts, such as “climate resilience” and “tipping points” in the sphere of climate–society interactions. This article is categorized under: Climate, History, Society, Culture > Major Historical Eras Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Communication Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Learning from Cases and Analogies

Adaptation (eye · Climate change · Climate science · Field (mathematics · Glacial period · Glaciology · Global warming · Ice age · Historical and Archaeological Studies · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Tree-ring climate responses