Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Lotman’s Semiosphere, Peirce’s Signs, and Cultural Processes

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12977849
AutoresFloyd Μerrell (autor de correspondencia)
Año2008
Volumen1
Número4
Páginas372-400
Fecha de publicación2008-09-01
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRussian Journal of Communication (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1940-9427 • E-ISSN: 1940-9419
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19409419.2008.10756726
OpenAlexW2033030858
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas14

This paper brings Lotman’s semiotic space to bear on Peirce’s concept of the sign with respect to broad cultural processes. Consideration of cultural processes in the Peircean mode calls for an extension of Lotman’s pair of terms, primary and secondary modeling systems, in view of Peirce’s notion of the sign as triadic. As a consequence of this extension, the premise in this inquiry has it that: (1) triadic signs within complex cultural processes are interdependent, interrelated and interactive, (2) triadic signs make up an interconnected, contradictory complementary convergent whole, which is inconsistent and/or incomplete, depending upon the cultural context, (3) inconsistency and incompleteness are of the nature of Peirce’s vagueness and generality respectively, the first being chiefly of the nature of the category of Firstness and the second chiefly of the nature of Thirdness, (4) the role of Secondness unfolds through acts of selection from the possibilities of Firstness, such acts of selection involving a separation of signs, their semiotic objects and their interpretants, (5) Thirdness renders signs general, yet generalities are almost invariably incomplete, given human fallibilism, hence the ‘final sign’ or ‘final interpretant’ is always out of reach, and (6) fallibilism breeds a tendency, within broad cultural processes, toward either (a) successive differentiation (or heterogeny) of signs, or (b) hegemony, dominance and subservience, and superordination and subordination

Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Generality · Indexicality · Linguistics · Premise · Semiotics · Sign (mathematics · Vagueness · History · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Psychology

  • Inside Facebook’s semiosphere. How social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization

    Remo Gramigna•Social Semiotics•2022

  • Social semiotics

    Григорий Львович Тульчинский•Russian Journal of Communication•2021

  • Oblique semiotics

    Open Access•Remo Gramigna•Semiotica•2023

  • The semiotics of culture in light of commonalities and conflicts in Lotmanian and Peircean theories

    Open Access•Claudio Julio Rodríguez Higuera•Culture & Psychology•2025

  • Sensing Corporeally

    Floyd Merrell, Floyd Μerrell•Sensing Corporeally•2016

  • Peirce, Signs, and Meaning

    Floyd Merrell, Floyd Μerrell•Peirce, Signs, and Meaning•2016

  • I.—studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I.)

    Carl G Hempel•Mind•1945

  • I.—studies in the Logic of Confirmation (Ii.)

    Carl G Hempel•Mind•1945

  • Capoeira and Candomblé

    Floyd Merrell, Floyd Μerrell•Capoeira and Candomblé•2005

  • Cultures, timespace, and the border of borders

    Open Access•Floyd Merrell, Floyd Μerrell•Semiotica•2005

  • Art and Physics

    Rudolf Arnheim, Leonard Shlain•Leonardo•1993

  • Social/Cultural Anthropology

    Open Access•Daniel T Linger•American Anthropologist•1992

  • Ways of Worldmaking

    Nelson Goodman, Jon W Sharer•Ways of Worldmaking•1978

Citas por año0,8
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae