Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Critique of radical religious paradigm

An epistemological analysis from principles of Islamic thought

Datos Bibliográficos

ID13032383
AutoresAde Dedi Rohayana (Universitas Pekalongan, autor de correspondencia), Muhammad Jauhari Sofi (0009-0009-4528-0337, Universitas Pekalongan)
Año2021
Volumen11
Número1
Páginas163-184
Fecha de publicación2021-06-21
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaIndonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2089-1490 • E-ISSN: 2406-825X
EditorialIAIN Salatiga (PUBLISHER • ID)
DOI10.18326/ijims.v11i1.163-184
OpenAlexW3176989445
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7

As one important factor enabling Islamophobia, radicalism has been a global issue endangering personal safety and public security. It is strongly associated with incorrect understanding of religious doctrines. This paper aims to present a critique of religious paradigm promoted by the radical groups from principles of Islamic thought (usul fiqh) perspective. Using epistemological analysis to uncover the nature of their religious understanding and its justification, this study argues that radical religious paradigm is characterized with monolithic, textual, and rigid interpretation of the sacred texts. According to the radical groups, the sources of Islamic laws or teachings are restricted to only the Quran and the hadith, leaving no space for alternative interpretations. They do not give a place for ra’yu (reason) in determining the laws or teachings. In the other hands, usul fiqh maintains that the sources of the Islamic laws or teachings are not restricted to only the two said sources; it also gives a place for ra’yu (reason). From usul fiqh perspective, the sources can also be found in the form of isyarah (signalling) and ruh (spirit) of the Quran and the hadith. In this sense, usul fiqh refuses the literal interpretation proposed by the radical groups since not all of the texts in the Quran and the hadith can be understood literally

Epistemology · Fiqh · Interpretation (philosophy · Islam · Perspective (graphical · Political radicalism · Political science · Politics · Sharia · Sociology · Theology · Education and Islamic Studies · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Philosophy · Qur’anic Interpretation Studies

  • Effectiveness of the McCarthy 4MAT Model in Developing Critical Thinking Skills and Shari’a Concepts in Islamic Education

    Open Access•Nabeeh Abdalmahdy Kasasbeh, Khawlah M Al-Tkhayneh et al.•Millah Journal of Religious Studies•2026

  • Norms and New Media as New Pillars of New Network Terrorism

    Open Access•Ahmad Saifuddin•al-Balagh Jurnal Dakwah dan…•2022

  • Local wisdom in economic practice

    Open Access•Abd Rahman R, Hasse Jubba et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2023

  • Salafi Movement Post-Conflict Ambon

    Open Access•Hasbollah Toisuta, Saidin Erna et al.•Journal of Al-Tamaddun•2023

  • The dialectic of fiqh understanding and the female Imam-Khatib tradition in Balingka, West Sumatra, Indonesia

    Open Access•Ikhwan, Azhariah Fatia et al.•Indonesian Journal of Islam and…•2022

  • Islamic Law at the Grassroot; Sigma Program at Bhasa Radio Situbondo and Its Controversy

    Open Access•Nawawi Nawawi, Muntaha Artalim Zaim et al.•AL-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum & Pranata…•2023

  • Actualization of Moderation in Reasoning at Ma’had Aly Salafiyah Syafi’iyah Sukorejo Situbondo and Its Influence on Istinbâth of Islamic Law

    Open Access•Ainol Yaqin, Moch Cholid Wardi et al.•AL-IHKAM Jurnal Hukum & Pranata…•2022

Citas por año1,75
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2026 (5)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae